Berkeley or UCSB for Undergraduate physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision to transfer to either Berkeley or UCSB for an undergraduate physics major, with a focus on preparing for a top PhD program in theoretical physics. The individual is weighing the benefits of each school, noting that while Berkeley has a stronger reputation in physics, UCSB offers more appealing upper division classes and electives. The course offerings at UCSB include a dedicated Methods of Theoretical Physics class and a broader range of electives, which the individual believes will enhance their education. Opinions shared in the thread suggest that while Berkeley's courses are standard, UCSB's curriculum may provide a more comprehensive understanding of key physics concepts. The conversation highlights the importance of course content and personal preference in making the final decision.
gizzard
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am planning on transferring to Berkeley or UCSB as an undergraduate physics major in the Fall 2011. My future academic goal is to get into a top notch PhD program for theoretical physics.

I am torn between the schools because although I know that Berkeley has a better reputation for physics, I like the upper division classes at UCSB better.


Upper Division classes at Berkeley

Analytic Mechanics 1 semester
Quantum Mechanics 2 semesters
Electromagnetism and Optics 1 semester
Statistical and Thermal Physics 1 semester
Advanced electrical laboratory 2 semesters
One elective


Upper Division classes at UCSB

Methods of Theoretical Physics (3 Units) 1 quarter
Classical Mechanics (6 Units) 2 quarters
Electromagnetism (8 Units) 2 quarters
Quantum Mechanics (12 Units) 3 quarters
Thermal and Statistical Physics (3 Units) 1 quarter
Analog Electronics (4 Units) 1 quarter
Advanced Experimental Physics (6 Units) 2 quarter
14 units of upper division physics electives, (inclduing thesis research)



When I look at these it seems to me like i will get a better education at UCSB because of the class on theoretical physics (which is aka math methods) and because of all the elective opportunities. Plus it seems like I will learn more EM and classical mechanics at UCSB too.




Any thoughts on my situation?


Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think Berkeley is forbidding you from taking equivalent classes there.
 
The "methods of theoretical physics" class was very enjoyable when I took it some time ago but I also love math so I'm most likely bias. The EM seemed pretty standard to be honest. Just giving my opinion from when I attended UCSB.
 
From what you know about the schools, may I know which you would prefer and why?
 
I do not dare presume my knowledge of the Physics undergraduate program at berkeley is thorough enough to answer that question, even though I have colleagues who attended there. However, if you have any questions about the undergraduate program at UCSB feel free to ask away.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top