Bernoulli Recursions: Formula & Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter yasiru89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bernoulli
yasiru89
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
I don't know if this is appropriate or not, here or anywhere. However, I propose this thread be used to post recursive formula for the Bernoulli numbers. It saves a great deal of frustration.
The first is simply,

\sum_{k = 0}^{n-1} \binom{n}{k} B_{k} = 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One of the first places I tried, maybe it'll be better if I'm a bit more specific- I need to show that,
(1 - 2^{2k}) B_{2k} = \sum_{r = 1}^{k} B_{2(k-r)} \binom{2k}{2r} (2^{2(k-r) - 1} - 1)
(should be right...)
Tried a few approaches, didn't work, I might not be trying hard enough(bit of a hectic period), I'd sure appreciate some help! A nod in the right direction even.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top