Bernoulli's Principle: Does it affect a non-flowing fluid in a moving container?

AI Thread Summary
Bernoulli's Principle does not apply to a non-flowing fluid in a moving container, such as air inside an accelerating airplane. While the air inside the cabin remains stationary relative to the walls, the external air moves past, creating a pressure difference. This results in higher pressure inside the cabin compared to outside, particularly at the rear during forward acceleration due to the accumulation of air molecules. The principle focuses on energy conservation in flowing fluids, not stationary ones. Therefore, the pressure inside the airplane is influenced by the relative motion of the external air rather than the internal air's flow.
woodfich
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Does Bernoulli's Principle affect a non-flowing fluid in a moving container?

As in, if I am in an air-sealed airplane at rest, and then the plane accelerates on the ground (but does not fly), does the gas pressure inside the plane change because the fluid (air inside the cabin) has a velocity with respect to the air outside?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
woodfich said:
Does Bernoulli's Principle affect a non-flowing fluid in a moving container?
I believe you mean, "Does Bernoulli's Principle apply to a non-flowing fluid in a moving container?" The answer is no, but there is another effect. There will be a pressure on the walls of the container. From your perspective (sitting inside the plane), the air is not moving, and the walls of the plane are not moving, so the air inside the plane is stationary w.r.t. the walls of the plane. However, the air outside the plane is rushing past, so the pressure on the outside of the wall is less than the pressure on the inside. It is about the relative motion of the air w.r.t. the surface.
 
I thought Bernoulli's Principle only applied to flow along a streamline?

Anyway, my guess is that there would be a pressure gradient, highest in the rear of the plane for forward acceleration, due to the momentum of the air molecules and relative velocities of the molecules to the aircraft. Think of the molecules as birds flying around in the plane. As the plane accelerates to velocities close to those of the birds, they will start piling up at the back. From PV = nRT, assuming no change in temperature (T) or volume (V) (rigid airframe), more molecules (n) in the rear means higher pressure (P).
 
No. Bernoulli principle is a statement about conversation of energy, where the total energy of a fluid or gas is considered to be the sum of pressure, kinetic energy, and gravitational energy. Generally temperaure is ignored. In an idealized situation, the energy can be converted between pressure, kinetic, and gravitational without peforming any work, so the energy remains constant. If gravitational energy isn't changed, then pressure change of a mass of air is inversely proporpotional to the (velocity change)^2 (KE = 1/2 m v^2) of that air.

The key here is that it's how the speed of the air is changed, not the actual speed or relative motion. If the speed is changed with virtually no work involved, then Bernoulli applies.

turin said:
It is about the relative motion of the air w.r.t. the surface.
The relative motion doesn't matter, it's how the relative motion was created.

If part of the surface of a solid moving through the air doesn't disturb the flow of the air, then a "static port" (hole) can be placed at that surface and the pressure inside a chamber connected to the static port will be virtually the same as the static pressure of the still air, even though the surface is moving with respect to the air. The relative motion between solid and air doesn't affect the pressure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitot-static_system
 
woodfich said:
Does Bernoulli's Principle affect a non-flowing fluid in a moving container?

As in, if I am in an air-sealed airplane at rest, and then the plane accelerates on the ground (but does not fly), does the gas pressure inside the plane change because the fluid (air inside the cabin) has a velocity with respect to the air outside?

Thanks.

The air inside is in motion w.r.t the air outside, but not w.r.t. the walls of the aircraft. What would drive the interior flow?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top