Best AP Review Guides: Princeton Review, Barron's, McGraw Hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salazar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ap Review
AI Thread Summary
For AP exam preparation, recommendations vary among popular review books. Princeton Review is noted for its concise and relevant content, particularly in history and physics, although some find its problems overly challenging. Barron's is praised for its in-depth coverage and difficulty level, especially for AP Calculus, as it offers harder problems that better prepare students for the exam. While review books can be beneficial, it's emphasized that consistent practice and problem-solving are crucial for success in AP Physics B, AP Calculus BC, and AP US History. Overall, while Princeton Review and Barron's have their strengths, the key to performing well lies in thorough practice and understanding of the material.
Salazar
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I need some recommendations for the *best* ap guide. I know princeton review is very popular, but some say is very simplistic and only covers basic materials. I also heard Barron's is pretty good at covering the material in depth. I really don't know much about McGraw Hill's 5 steps to a 5. I ap exams I am planing to take are AP Physics B, AP Calculus BC, and AP US History. (I may also register for AP Comp Sci A, depending on my schedule after new year's eve)

Thanks and I really appreciate your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off I'd like to assure you that you don't need a review book to take these exams and do well.

That being said my sister did use Princeton for biology and us history and passed both with a 5 so perhaps they helped? (Certainly didn't hurt if you've got the money)

As far as physics and calc goes just do as many problems as you can. It's the fastest way to get better.
 
Barron's for Calculus. The problems are harder than the real exam, and so you are better prepared.

The Princeton Review generally has good history books. I used the AP World one and found it concise and relevant to the exam format.

As for Physics, I also recommend the PR. The Physics C Princeton Review had ridiculously difficult problems, which I felt were an ideal preparation for the exam. The problems are definitely not "too simple," at least not in the physics books.
 
imo Princeton is just a bit over the top and discourages some students, Barrons is about right for Physics AP-C if you must cram or get a good review. No substitute for practicing problems constantly during the year assuming the concepts are clear. Even Go back and practice the ones you have already done without looking back at the answers.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top