Best College-level Physics Text?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sidm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Text
AI Thread Summary
A high school senior preparing for college physics seeks recommendations for a suitable textbook that effectively explains concepts and problem-solving techniques. They recently purchased Giancoli's "Physics: Principles with Applications" but find the fourth chapter's problems challenging. Suggestions include Serway & Beichner's "Physics for Scientists & Engineers," which is praised for thorough concept explanations but may require independent problem-solving. Additionally, "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker is recommended for its clarity in explaining concepts and providing problem-solving examples. Engaging with the material and seeking help when stuck is also encouraged.
sidm
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm a high school senior who's never taken physics but I plan on doing so in college. I'd like to get a good start...I'm very good w/ the sciences..i'm in the IB-program so I really would like to get a good headstart..plan on studying over the summer.
Just two days ago I bought PHYSICS (principles with applications) by GIANCOLI. I got past the third chapter with minimal help...but the problems on the 4th get too challenging for my taste. Is there any text out there that you feel does an awesome job of explaining the concepts AND how2 solve these problems?
Thanks

Cheers,
sid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used, and I like, the Serway&Beichner text Physics for Scientists & Engineers, but many people complain that it doesn't exactly walk you through how to solve all the problems. i.e. it explains MOST of the concepts very thoroughly, but it also makes you puzzle out some of them on your own via problems, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Why not just try to bulldog your way through them as well as you can, & post questions here when you get stuck?

You might also look at a Schaum's outline for problem-solving hints.
 
I highly recommend you the famous college-level calculus based physics text, "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick and Walker...it does a very good job explaining the concepts...it also gives you examples and techniques on how to approach problems.

Hope that helpz.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top