Which Vector Notation is Best for Physics, Engineering, and Mathematics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the preferred vector notation among physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, highlighting the use of column matrices in linear algebra versus the component notation (xi + yj + zk) in other contexts. Participants note that while the column matrix is ideal for matrix operations, the component notation is often quicker and simpler for calculations, especially when dealing with cross-products. The conversation also touches on the importance of coordinate systems in vector and tensor equations, emphasizing that these equations remain invariant regardless of the chosen system. Additionally, Einstein notation and coordinate-free notation are mentioned as advanced methods that can simplify complex vector manipulations. Ultimately, the choice of notation depends on the specific application and the user's familiarity with the different systems.
thegreenlaser
Messages
524
Reaction score
16
I'm curious, which vector notation is preferred by physicists/engineers/mathematicians? In linear algebra we used matrix notation exclusively, putting the x,y,z,... components down a column matrix. (no idea how to put this in latex). In all my other courses though, we've been using (xi +yj +zk) notation where x,y,z are the components of the vector and i,j,k are unit vectors on the x, y, and z axes respectively.

Which notation do you prefer for which situations and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I am writing quickly, just <x, y, z> will do. Typically, I would use the "column matrix" form only if I were working with matrices.

By the way, you can do matrices in LaTex with \begin{bmatrix}... \end{bmatrix} for "square brackets" or \begin{pmatrix} ... \end{pmatrix} for "parentheses". Use & to separate items on a single line and \\ to separate lines a single column matrix would be
\begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}:
\begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}.

You can see the code for that, or any LaTex, by double clicking on the expression.
 
hi thegreenlaser! :wink:

xi +yj +zk is often easier to write,

and it's a lot easier to make cross-products with! :smile:
 
It definitely depends on the application. The thing about vectors and tensors in physics is that they don't depend on the coordinate system you use to describe them. You can use coordinate free notation, like C=A+B, but it can get messy, its much easier sometimes to use the "language" of a coordinate system to talk about vectors, like C1=A1+B1, C2=A2+B2, etc. But then sometimes you have to deal with the fact that the vector and tensor equations using these coordinate systems are independent of those coordinate systems. This can get messy too, but Einstein developed a way of describing vectors using coordinate systems along with a bunch of rules about how to manipulate them which automatically shows you the invariance of the equations. Check out "Einstein notation" and "Coordinate free notation" on Wikipedia. It takes some work to get the hang of it, but once you do, its a very valuable tool in your vector/tensor toolkit.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top