Is Betelgeuse Already a Supernova?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mgb_phys
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Betelgeuse, a red supergiant star, is experiencing significant shrinkage, indicating it may be on the verge of going supernova. As it is approximately 400 light-years away, it is possible that it has already exploded, but the light from the event has not yet reached Earth. The star is expected to be a type II supernova, which will be bright but not excessively so. Ongoing cycles of shrinkage and expansion are anticipated before it ultimately collapses. This situation raises intriguing questions about the timing and visibility of stellar explosions.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Betelgeuse! Betelgeuse! Betel-- BOOM!
 
Betelgeuse is definitely on the virge of going nova [core collapse]. The shrinking thing is a clue. Shrink and expansion cycles will likely occur for many more years before it gives up the ghost.
 
So technically, it could have exploded many years ago. We just can't notice it yet. I find that quite thought provoking.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top