Bethe-Salpeter equation confused

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neitrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Dear PF,

Im reading something about bound states & there I one question.
The Bethe-Salpeter equation for a bound pair B deals with the amplitude:

Phi (x,y)=<0|TPsi(x)Psi_bar(y)|B>, |B> is a bound pair state, <0| vacuum...what i missunderstand how it can be the transition between some bound state and vacuum? What about conseravation rules..
Or generally what amplitude is it what transition does it describe?

If I even wright something bad pls correct me.
Thks

Any books where this is described?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Bethe-Salpeter equation for a bound pair B describes the amplitude of a transition between a bound state and the vacuum. Conservation rules, such as energy and momentum conservation, still apply. The amplitude Phi (x,y) is related to the probability amplitude of the transition occurring. This equation is often used to describe the interactions between particles in atomic and molecular systems. You can find more information about the Bethe-Salpeter equation in books such as "Quantum Mechanics: A Textbook for Undergraduates" by Oleg V. Prezhdo and "Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics" by Henrik Bruus and Karsten Flensberg.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top