Bifurcation Points and Stability Analysis for x' = x(r - ex)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bifurcation
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Just making sure I understand this stuff. One question on my homework asks about x' = x(r - ex).

Homework Equations



Definition. From my textbook: "The qualitative structure of the flow can change as parameters are varied. In particular, fixed points can be created or destroyed, or their stability can change. These qualitative changes in the dynamics are called bifurcations, and the parameter values at which they occur are called bifurcation points."


The Attempt at a Solution



So I want to think about how this system changes when r takes on different values.

If r = 0, then we have x' = -xex, which means x' = 0 iff x = 0. As x increases beyond 0, x' decreases, and as x decreases beyond 0, x' increases. So x* = 0 is the only fixed point and is stable.

If r < 0, then, still, x' = -xex = 0 iff x = 0, since r - ex = 0 does not have a solution. As x increases beyond 0, x' decreases, and as x decreases beyond 0, x' increases. So, again, x* = 0 is the only fixed point and is stable.

If r = 1, then then x' = 0 iff x = 0. If x < 0, then x' > 0, and if x > 0, then x' < 0. As x increases beyond 0, x' decreases, and as x decreases beyond 0, x' increases. So x* = 0 is the only fixed point and is stable.

If 0 < r < 1 or 1 < r, then x' = 0 iff x = 0 or ln(r).

^ That's the part that's giving me trouble. Do I have to break it into cases of 0 < r < 1 and 1 < r? I'm afraid I'll have to. This question is very annoying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to be correct apart from this:

Jamin2112 said:
If r = 1, then then x' = 0 iff x = 0. If x < 0, then x' > 0, and if x > 0, then x' < 0. As x increases beyond 0, x' decreases, and as x decreases beyond 0, x' increases. So x* = 0 is the only fixed point and is stable.

If x &lt; 0, then e^x &lt; 1 so x&#039; = x(1 - e^x) &lt; 0. Thus the origin is stable from above (x > 0), but unstable from below (x < 0).

If 0 < r < 1 or 1 < r, then x' = 0 iff x = 0 or ln(r).

^ That's the part that's giving me trouble. Do I have to break it into cases of 0 < r < 1 and 1 < r? I'm afraid I'll have to. This question is very annoying.

Yes.

Has your textbook mentioned that a fixed point of x&#039; = f(x) is stable if
\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}x} &lt; 0
and unstable if
\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}x} &gt; 0?
 
pasmith said:
Has your textbook mentioned that a fixed point of x&#039; = f(x) is stable if
\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}x} &lt; 0
and unstable if
\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}x} &gt; 0?


Yeah, but I still need to draw the d*** diagrams, so I got to know whether x' > 0 or x' < 0 in these ranges.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top