Big-O Notation Question: Polynomial with Variable Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expressing a polynomial with variable coefficients in Big-O notation, specifically the form βx^5 + β^2x^7 + β^3x^9, represented as a series. The original poster notes that if β were constant, the expression could be simplified to O(x^5). They explore the implications of treating β as a variable while analyzing the behavior as x approaches 0. Another participant suggests that the series resembles a geometric series, which could lead to a closed form that clarifies its asymptotic behavior. The conversation emphasizes the need to consider both variables in the context of Big-O notation for accurate analysis.
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,

I have a polynomial having the form:

\beta x^5 + \beta^2 x^7 + \beta^3 x^9 + \ldots = \sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}\beta^n x^{2n+3}

How can I express this with Big-O notation?
Please, note that I consider β as another variable (independent from x). I already know that if β was a constant I could express the above quantity as O(x^5).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First of all I forgot to mention that x\geq 0 and \beta \in \mathbb{R}.

I will try to apply the definition found in Wikipedia, although that definition refers specifically to functions of one-variable. I am not sure we can use that definition, but I will try.

Let's "pretend" that β is a constant and x the variable. We have: f(x)=\beta x^5 + \beta^2 x^7 + \beta^3 x^9\ldots

and I am interested in studying the behavior for x\to 0.
We have that: |\beta x^5 + \beta^2 x^7 + \beta^3 x^9\ldots | \leq |\beta| x^5 + |\beta^2| x^7 + |\beta^3| x^9\ldots \leq |\beta| x^5 + |\beta^2| x^5 + |\beta^3| x^5 \ldots, hence we have f(x)\in O(r^5), as expected.

By considering β variable, and x constant we have f(\beta) \in O(\beta).

Now what?
 
So you want x->0 and \beta \to 0 right?

Your series looks a lot like a geometric series. In fact
\sum_{i=1}^\infty \beta^nx^{3+2n} = x^3\sum_{i=1}^\infty (\beta x^2)^n
For small enough \beta and x you should get a nice closed form from which you can more easily see the series' asymptotic behavior.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top