Bijection Proof for Sets and Functions - A Comprehensive Guide

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Let A and B be sets and let [tex]f: A \rightarrow B[/tex] be a function. Define a function

[tex]h: \mathcal{P} (B) \rightarrow \mathcal{P} (A)[/tex] by declaring that for [tex]Y \in\mathcal{P} (B)[/tex], [tex]h(Y)= \{ x \in A: f(x) \notin Y \}[/tex]. Show that if [tex]f[/tex] is a bijection then h is a bijection.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not quite sure where to start. I could start by first showing that f is one to one & onto and then show that f = h by showing that:
dom(f) = dom(h)
cod(f) = cod(h)
And, [tex]\forall x \in dom(f), f(x)=h(x)[/tex]

Of course, I can't do this because the question doesn't define function f (it only gived domain & codomain)! Does anyone know how to prove this question?

P.S. the notation [tex]\mathcal{P} (A)[/tex] and [tex]\mathcal{P} (B)[/tex] are supposed to represent the power set of A & B.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
I could start by first showing that f is one to one & onto and then show that f = h by showing that:
dom(f) = dom(h)
cod(f) = cod(h)
And, [tex]\forall x \in dom(f), f(x)=h(x)[/tex]
Well, let's start with this. You know several of those subexpressions, don't you? e.g. you know what dom(h) is. What happens when you substitute those values into those equations?
 
roam said:
Show that if [tex]f[/tex] is a bijection then h is a bijection.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not quite sure where to start. I could start by first showing that f is one to one & onto and then show that f = h by showing that:
dom(f) = dom(h)
cod(f) = cod(h)
And, [tex]\forall x \in dom(f), f(x)=h(x)[/tex]

No, this won't work. For one thing, you don't have to show that f is one to one and onto. That would be showing that f is a bijection and your question starts with the assumption that f is a bijection. You don't have to prove it.

Also, [tex]f \neq h[/tex]! You mention showing that their domains are the same, but that's not true. That's actually written in your question statement also. The domain of f is [tex]A[/tex], but the domain of [tex]h[/tex] is [tex]P(B)[/tex]. So f acts on elements of the set [tex]A[/tex], whereas h acts on subsets of the set [tex]B[/tex]. Totally different.

You need to assume that f is a bijection (i.e. one to one and onto) and then show that h must be as well. Just go through the proofs for each of these requirements. For one to one, assume [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2)[/tex], then looking at the definitions of [tex]h(Y)[/tex] in the question (using that f is bijective), you should be able to conclude that [tex]Y_1 = Y_2[/tex]. Then for onto, select an arbitrary subset of [tex]A[/tex], say [tex]A_0[/tex], then try to determine a subset of [tex]B[/tex] that must map to it.
 
Hi mathie girl, your method sounds good. Suppose f is a bijection,

for [tex]Y_1 , Y_2 \in \mathcal{P}(B) = dom(h)[/tex]

Here's the problem: I really can't figure out how to show [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2) \Rightarrow Y_1 = Y_2[/tex] using what is given in the question, I don't know what steps to take. What would you propose? I'm very confused atm :confused:
 
roam said:
Hi mathie girl, your method sounds good. Suppose f is a bijection,

for [tex]Y_1 , Y_2 \in \mathcal{P}(B) = dom(h)[/tex]

Here's the problem: I really can't figure out how to show [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2) \Rightarrow Y_1 = Y_2[/tex] using what is given in the question, I don't know what steps to take. What would you propose? I'm very confused atm :confused:

Okay, you're assuming that [tex]h(Y_1) = h(Y_2)[/tex], right? So [tex]h(Y_1)= \{ x \in A: f(x) \notin Y_1 \}= \{ x \in A: f(x) \notin Y_2 \} = h(Y_2)[/tex]. Then I'd probably do it by contradiction, assuming that [tex]Y_1 \neq Y_2[/tex], so WLOG (without loss of generality) there's some element [tex]b \in Y_1 \setminus Y_2[/tex]. Then using the bijectivity of [tex]f[/tex] and the definition of [tex]h[/tex] to figure out something about [tex]h(Y_1), h(Y_2)[/tex]. Hopefully that's enough to get you started!

Also, the onto part should be much easier. So at least this is the hard part. :smile: