Binomial Probability Problems: Finding Probability for Glasses and DMF Teeth

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eMac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Probability
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 6K views
eMac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Problem 1: About 50% of all persons age 3 and older wear glasses or contact lenses. For a randomly selected group of five people find the probability that:
a. exactly three wear glasses or contact lenses
b. at least one wears them
c. at most one wears them

For this problem I set n=5, p=.25, and q(1-p)=.75

For (a) I used y=3, I set up a combination of (5 choose 3) * ((.25)^3) * ((.75)^2)

For (b) and (c) I'm confused as to what I should choose for (y).

Problem 2: If 25% of 11-year old children have no decayed, missing, or filled (DMF) teeth, find the probability that in a sample of 20 children there will be:

a. exactly 3 with no DMF teeth
b. 3 or more with no DMF teeth
c. fewer than 3 with no DMF teeth
d. exactly 5 with no DMF teeth

I set n=20, p=.25, and q(1-p)=.75

I'm not sure if I am setting up these right or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eMac:

Why are you using p=0.25, if 50% wear glasses?
 
Bacle said:
eMac:

Why are you using p=0.25, if 50% wear glasses?

Because it said 50% of people over the age of 3. So 50% don't have it and then 50% of the 50% left don't have it, thus .25. At least I think.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
compute 1.0 minus the probability that zero wear them.
Add the probability that zero wear them and the probability that exactly 1 wears them.

Thank you, this helped.
 
I'm glad it helped. As Bacle pointed out, I think you should re-examine your reasoning about the using 0.25 in the first problem. Your thinking would only be correct if 50% of the population were less than 3 years old. The problem isn't phrased precisely, but it's probably best to assume none of the 5 people is less than 3 years old.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
I'm glad it helped. As Bacle pointed out, I think you should re-examine your reasoning about the using 0.25 in the first problem. Your thinking would only be correct if 50% of the population were less than 3 years old. The problem isn't phrased precisely, but it's probably best to assume none of the 5 people is less than 3 years old.

Yea, I changed it to .5, I guess I was trying to look too deep into the problem.