Biochemistry: Henderson-Hasselbalch Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter cookiebookie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biochemistry
AI Thread Summary
To titrate one mole of the fully protonated peptide V-A-Y-K-H to a pH of 4.00, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is applied, using the pKa of the alpha COOH group at 2.4. The calculation shows that at pH 4.00, the ratio of deprotonated (A) to protonated (HA) forms is approximately 39.8:1. This indicates that nearly all of the carboxyl group will be deprotonated, requiring just under one mole of base for neutralization. The initial concentration of the peptide is not necessary for determining the moles needed, as the problem specifies one mole of peptide. Therefore, slightly less than one mole of base is required to achieve the desired pH.
cookiebookie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How many moles of base would be needed to titrate one mole of this fully protonated peptide to a pH of 4.00?

This polypeptide is V-A-Y-K-H.

Homework Equations



Henderson-Hasselbalch: pH= pKa + log[A]/[HA]

pKa of alpha COOH = 2.4
The alpha COOH (at the C-Terminus) is the only portion of the molecule that is deprotonated (basic) at pH 4.00, so we use its pKa for the calculation.

The Attempt at a Solution



pH = pKa + log [A]/[HA]
4.0 = 2.4 + log [A]/[HA]
1.6= log [A]/[HA]
39.8 = A/HA

I'm not sure how to go from the ratio of A/HA to the moles of base needed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need initial concentration of peptide. Then, knowing final ratio, you can easily calculate concentration of the neutralized peptide and amount of NaOH can be calculated from the neutralization stoichiometry.
 
What that
cookiebookie said:
39.8 = A/HA

is saying is a way of saying what should be evident from the fact that the pH 4 is substantially (by 1.6 units) above the pK, so the carboxyl will be almost all deprotonated (to within about 2.5% in fact) so the number of moles required is just under 1.

(Sorry Borek, the question was about moles so you do not need concentration.)
 
Yep, missed the "one mole" part. Sorry about that.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top