Black Body Radiation: Classical Equipartition vs Boltzmann Distribution

tut_einstein
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If you consider the standard cavity experiment for black body radiation, you know that the number of standing wave modes at higher frequencies is higher than the number of modes at lower frequencies. Therefore, according to classical equipartition theorem, there should be more energy in the higher frequencies. However, the Boltzmann distribution, which also holds classically predicts that there's a greater probability of finding the system in a lower energy state. Why do the two contradict or am I missing something here?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You meant Planck's distribution, not Boltzmann's?
It can't be explained in classical physics. Actually, the explanation of black body radiation distribution was one of the milestones confirming quantum theory 100 years ago.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top