Black holes, Creating Black holes

  • Thread starter Thread starter omiros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
Particles at a black hole's event horizon do not possess unboundedly large kinetic energy, as their energy remains conserved along their trajectory until they reach the singularity. The mass of a black hole includes everything within it, meaning that any infalling observer contributes to its overall mass without experiencing any extraordinary effects. The concept of creating a black hole from collisions at the event horizon is not supported by current understanding, as the conditions inside a black hole differ fundamentally from those outside. Additionally, while special relativity applies, the mass-energy considerations within a black hole do not lead to the creation of new black holes. Overall, the formation and characteristics of black holes are governed by established principles of general relativity.
omiros
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody, I am a first year physics student and I've got two more questions.

Assuming that particles in a black holes event horizon have huge kinetic energy, if they collide, can't they create a black hole? I am asking that, because if we have a probability or pontentially be able to create a really small black hole at CERN (because of the high in energy particles), how about black holes being created, in a black hole's event horizon?

Also, shouldn't the mass and energy in a black hole's event horizon, be even bigger than that of the black hole on its own? If we apply special relativity on a black holes event horizon, shouldn't objects mass there become huge, and hence their sum huge too?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Black holes in GR form due to massive gravitational collapse. That gravitational collapse leads to black holes can be proven mathematically, more or less.

2. The energy of a particle is not necessarily "unboundedly large" inside a black hole. For example in Schwarzschild space-time, free falling particles have a conserved energy ##E## along their trajectory. If the particle starts out free falling at infinity with some initial energy ##E## then this will remain constant along the particle's worldline (all of this valid before the worldline terminates at a physical singulairty of course).

3. The mass of a black hole accounts for everything contained in the black hole. A free falling observer infalling into a black hole will contribute to its overall mass. In the observer's own frame will, he/she simply fall through with nothing special happening (assuming tidal forces are not significant enough to rip apart the observer before he/she falls through).
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Back
Top