Black Holes: Volume & Forces Explored

Invutil
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Do black hole singularities have 0 volume? What forces are keeping the particles from being in the same place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Invutil said:
What forces are keeping the particles from being in the same place?
If there is a singularity, none, and a singularity has a volume of 0 (otherwise it wouldn't be a singularity, at least not in our universe).
It is unclear if there is a singularity, as we don't have a proper unification of quantum physics and general relativity, and there both are relevant at the same time.
 
We just had a discussion of this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...s-equal-to-schwarzschild-radius.841320/unread

The brief answer is that in classical relativity, a singularity is not part of the spacetime manifold. It's not a point or a set of points. There is not even any straightforward way to define whether it's one-dimensional, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional. We certainly can't say whether or not it has volume, because that would require the use of the metric, and a singularity represents a breakdown of the metric.

This may be helpful: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/boundary-construction-for-of-b-h-and-b-b-singularities.833399/

mfb said:
If there is a singularity, none, and a singularity has a volume of 0 (otherwise it wouldn't be a singularity, at least not in our universe).

This is wrong, for the reasons given above.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb
Hmm, right. It's probably better to say its volume is not well-defined.
 
mfb said:
Hmm, right. It's probably better to say its volume is not well-defined.

I would just say that there's no "it" whose volume we could even try to define. Classical GR doesn't describe a singularity as a physical or geometrical thing. Asking for physical characteristics of a singularity is like asking what time it is when the tip of the minute hand is at the center of the clock. The dial only exists around the circumference of the circle, not at its center. You might think that a black hole's mass, charge, and spin were properties attributable to the singularity, but GR doesn't actually describe them this way; they're properties of the whole spacetime that are only defined by an observer at asymptotic infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz, Smattering and mfb
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top