Bloch wavepackets and the Pauli exclusion principle

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the use of wavepackets in solid state physics and their relationship with the Pauli exclusion principle. A key point raised is the concern that forming a wavepacket over multiple Bloch vectors could violate the exclusion principle by allowing two electrons to occupy states that are too close together. However, it is clarified that two wavepackets centered around different k-values can coexist without violating the principle, as their combined wavefunction remains antisymmetric. The discussion emphasizes that symmetrization is valid for wavepackets as long as they are not centered on the same eigenvalue. Overall, the interaction of wavepackets and the Pauli exclusion principle can be reconciled through proper mathematical treatment.
pedda
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a question concerning the use of wavepackets to justify the semiclassical approach in solid state physics. In Ashcroft/Mermin, the authors briefly mention that we can construct wave packets and then use them to describe the motion of the center which can be interpreted as what one usually calls the point particle electron. Now, the problem that I have is that for each state there is one Bloch vector k. If I was to form a wave packet spreading over several k, how can there be a second electron occupying the state k' that is right next to k? The packet centered around k will definitely have components of wave vector k' and vice versa. Doesn't this violate the pauli exclusion principle?

- Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump!
I have the same question :(. Did you manage to resolve it Peter??
 
Hey,

yes, I did resolve it for me, but I don't know if it is correct. The Pauli exclusion principle states that the wave function has to be antisymmetric with respect to the exchange of particles. The fact that you have two wavepackets centered around two different ks doesn't violate this principle, even if they are centered at the same place. You can write down the wavefunction for two gaussian wavepackets in the position representation. You will see that you will get something like

e^{-(x_1-ik_1)^2}e^{-(x_2-ik_2)^2}-e^{-(x_1-ik_2)^2}e^{-(x_2-ik_1)^2}

+ some prefactors and other stuff. As you see, no problem here!

Hope this helps, Peter
 
I don't see any way to edit my last post, but an important part that I left out is the actual time development that appears in the denominator of the exponentials, so don't take what I've written too seriously. The most important part is that symmetrization works even for wavepackets as long as they are not centered around the same eigenvalue k.
 
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K