Is BMI an Accurate Measure of Health?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Choppy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights findings from a Science Daily article indicating that nearly half of individuals classified as "overweight" by BMI metrics are actually healthy according to more comprehensive health assessments, while around 30% of those with a "normal" BMI may be unhealthy. It emphasizes that BMI can serve as a useful tool for physicians, who understand its limitations, but warns against its indiscriminate use by employers and insurance companies. The conversation points out that the health risks associated with being overweight, such as metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, are often long-term concerns rather than immediate health issues, particularly for younger individuals. Additionally, the study's lack of focus on age demographics is noted, suggesting that it may not adequately represent the health status of older populations more prone to disease.
Choppy
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
4,999
Reaction score
2,528
I saw this article this morning:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160204042240.htm

According to the article close to half of the people considered "overweight" by the BMI are in fact healthy by other more rigorous metrics, and about 30% of those with a "normal" BMI are unhealthy.

I would argue that like any other metric, BMI can be used as a tool by physicians to evaluate health, but that's because physicians are generally aware of it's limitations. The danger comes in when employers and insurance companies start applying it blindly.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and berkeman
Biology news on Phys.org
The health issue of obesity and overweight as it is usually posed is that these people are at more risk of developing metabolic syndrome or cardiovascular disease later on in life not that they have it. If you are young enough you are usually healthy. Smoker are healthy until they develop lung cancer or COPD.

There is no reference to age so It seems they studied the whole population not the part (>60 yrs) that is more likely to manifest a disease process.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes billy_joule, Choppy and berkeman
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top