Boas 4.12.18, 2nd Derivatives of Imp. Multivariable Integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves showing that the function u(x, y) = y/π ∫-∞∞ f(t) dt / ((x - t)² + y²) satisfies the Laplace equation uxx + uyy = 0. The discussion centers around the application of Leibniz' Rule and the behavior of the function at specific points, particularly when y = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the applicability of Leibniz' Rule due to potential discontinuities in the integrand. There are attempts to compute first and second derivatives, with some questioning the correctness of their expressions. Others raise concerns about the implications of the factor of π in the function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants providing feedback on each other's derivative calculations and interpretations of the function. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the derivatives and the importance of clarity in notation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a discontinuity in the integrand when x = t and y = 0, which raises questions about the validity of certain mathematical operations. Additionally, the role of the factor of π in the context of Green's functions is being explored.

mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43

Homework Statement


Show that u(x, y) = y/π ∫-∞ f(t) dt / ((x - t)2+y2) satisfies uxx + uyy = 0.

Homework Equations


Leibniz' Rule

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not even sure Leibniz' Rule can be applied here since there seems to be a discontinuity in the integrand when x=t and y=0. When I use it and take the second derivatives, I get terms that have no way of cancelling (for example the -2(x-t) and -2y terms). I also tried integration by parts first but it did not simplify things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The function does not satisfy the Laplace equation in two dimensions at ##y = 0##. The Green's function of the Poisson equation in 2D is proportional to ##\ln(r^2/r_0^2)##. It is a matter of rather straight-forward computations to show that your function corresponds to a source term of the form ##f(x) \delta'(y)##, i.e.,
$$
u_{xx} + u_{yy} \propto f(x) \delta'(y).
$$
 
So my goal is to show the Laplace equation is satisfied for all other values of y?
 
For other values of ##y##, you should indeed get zero.
 
Are my first derivatives correct?

With (x-t)2+y2=g for compactness:

ux=-2xy/π∫f(t)dt/g2 + 2y/π∫t*f(t)dt/g2

uy=1/π∫f(t)dt/g - 2y2/π∫f(t)dt/g2
 
I suggest you remove the integral, ##\pi##, and ##f(t)## for readability. They will always be there. I also strongly recommend against splitting the ##(x-t)## into two terms in the first derivative wrt ##x##, but yes, they look correct.
 
$$ u_x = \frac {-2y(x-t)}{g^2}$$

$$ u_y = \frac {1}{g} - \frac {2y^2}{g^2} $$
 
Yes, that looks fine. Now the second derivatives.
 
$$u_{xx} = \frac {1}{g^2} - \frac {4(x-t)^2}{g^3}$$

$$u_{yy} = \frac {8y^3}{g^3} - \frac{6y}{g^2}$$

edit: oops I forgot the -2y in ##u_{xx}##
 
  • #10
You are missing the inner derivative of the first term in ##u_{xx}## and a factor 2 in the second term (one from the ##g^2## in the denominator and one from the inner derivative). You also have some sign errors.

Edit: Ok, what is missing is your factor ##-2y##. So what do you get when you do the sum?
 
  • #11
$$u_{xx} + u_{yy} = 8y \left( \frac {y^2-(x-t)^2}{g^3} - \frac {1}{g^2}\right)$$

Alright, I see it now. Thank you!
 
  • #12
Auxillary question, why is the factor of π included in u(x,y)? Is u a function that comes up in the sciences?
 
  • #13
The factor 1/pi is obviuosly irrelevant for whether or not you get zero. It is however an important overall factor in the definition of the Green’s function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mishima
  • #14
mishima said:

Homework Statement


Show that u(x, y) = y/π ∫-∞ f(t) dt / ((x - t)2+y2) satisfies uxx + uyy = 0.

Homework Equations


Leibniz' Rule

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not even sure Leibniz' Rule can be applied here since there seems to be a discontinuity in the integrand when x=t and y=0. When I use it and take the second derivatives, I get terms that have no way of cancelling (for example the -2(x-t) and -2y terms). I also tried integration by parts first but it did not simplify things.
Your expression is ambiguous. I genuinely cannot tell if you mean
$$u(x,t) = \frac{y}{\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{f(t)}{(x-t)^2+y^2}\hspace{4ex}(1)$$
or
$$ u(x,t) = \frac{y}{\pi \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{f(t)}{(x-t)^2 + y^2} \, dt} \hspace{5ex}(2)$$
or, possibly, something else. Please use parentheses to make everything clear and unabmiguous (or, better still, use LaTeX to typeset your expressions, just as I have done in the above).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K