Boas: Mathematical Methods for Phys Sci Pr.1.13.25

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = 2x / (e^(2x) - 1), which presents a challenge due to the division by zero at x = 0. Participants are tasked with determining the series terms, general term, and verifying results through computation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the discontinuity at x = 0 and consider using limits to resolve the division by zero issue. Suggestions include applying L'Hôpital's rule and utilizing the Maclaurin series expansion of e^u.

Discussion Status

There is active exploration of the limit as x approaches 0, with some participants suggesting methods to find this limit. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of how to handle the function's definition at that point, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem could have been clearer regarding the function's definition at x = 0, indicating that the original poster's confusion stems from the lack of explicit guidance on handling removable discontinuities.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
Mclaurin Series with Division by Zero?

Boas: Mathematical Methods for Phys Sci Pr.1.13.25

Homework Statement



Using the methods of this section:
(a) Find the first few terms of the Maclaurin series for each of the following functions.
(b) Find the general term and write the series in summation form.
(c) Check your results in (a) by computer.
(d) Use a computer to plot the function and several approximating partial sums of the
series.

[tex]f(x)=\frac { 2x }{ { e }^{ 2x }-1 }[/tex]


Homework Equations



[tex]f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f^{n}(0)x^{n}/n![/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Since f(0) is division by zero, how do you find a Maclaurin series for it?

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the function, as written, is not defined. But it is a "removable" discontinuity. I suspect they intend you to use the limit there. You can simplify by letting u= 2x. Then the limit is [itex]\lim_{u\to 0}\frac{u}{e^u- 1}[/itex]. And now you can take that limit in a number of ways:
1) l'hospital's rule: differentiating both numerator and denominator gives [itex]\frac{1}{e^u}[/itex] which has limit 1 as u goes to 0.

2) Since you are dealing with MacLaurin series, the MacLaurin series of [itex]e^u[/itex] is [itex]1+ x+ x^2/2+ x^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex]. So [itex]e^u- 1= u+ u^2/2+u^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex] and [itex]\frac{u}{e^u- 1}= \frac{u}{u+ u^2/2+ u^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot}[/itex][itex]= \frac{1}{1+ u/2+ u^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot}[/itex] which again has limit 1 as u goes to 0.

(It would have been better if the problem had said "[itex]f(x)= \frac{2x}{e^{2x}- 1}[/itex] if [itex]x \ne 0[/itex], [itex]f(0)= 1[/itex]".)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Find the limit, if it exist, as x goes to 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, the function, as written, is not defined. But it is a "removable" discontinuity. I suspect they intend you to use the limit there. You can simplify by letting u= 2x. Then the limit is [itex]\lim_{u\to 0}\frac{u}{e^u- 1}[/itex]. And now you can take that limit in a number of ways:
1) l'hospital's rule: differentiating both numerator and denominator gives [itex]\frac{1}{e^u}[/itex] which has limit 1 as u goes to 0.

2) Since you are dealing with MacLaurin series, the MacLaurin series of [itex]e^u[/itex] is [itex]1+ x+ x^2/2+ x^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex]. So [itex]e^u- 1= u+ u^2/2+u^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex] and [itex]\frac{u}{e^u- 1}= \frac{u}{u+ u^2/2+ u^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot}[/itex][itex]= \frac{1}{1+ u/2+ u^3/6+ \cdot\cdot\cdot}[/itex] which again has limit 1 as u goes to 0.

(It would have been better if the problem had said "[itex]f(x)= \frac{2x}{e^{2x}- 1}[/itex] if [itex]x \ne 0[/itex], [itex]f(0)= 1[/itex]".)

Yes, they don't mention using the limit if f(0)=D.N.E, and I should have use L'Hosp.

Thanks,
Chris
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K