Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization Rule for 3D Systems

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
"Old" quantum mechanics

There is famous Bohr Sommerfeld quantization rule which says that [tex]\oint p dx = n h[/tex]. Is it possible to apply this rule to three dimensonal system e.g. hydrogen atom.
The integral will probably look as follow:
[tex] \int \sqrt{2E - \frac{l^2}{r^2}+\frac{\alpha c \hbar}{r}} = n h[/tex]
But I don't know which the contour I should chose.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


paweld said:
There is famous Bohr Sommerfeld quantization rule which says that [tex]\oint p dx = n h[/tex]. Is it possible to apply this rule to three dimensonal system e.g. hydrogen atom.
The integral will probably look as follow:
[tex] \int \sqrt{2E - \frac{l^2}{r^2}+\frac{\alpha c \hbar}{r}} = n h[/tex]
But I don't know which the contour I should chose.

In the hydrogen of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model, the orbital becomes elliptical or circular.
So simply I use the two-dimensonal system.
The orbital length becomes a integer times the de Broglie's wavelength ([tex]\lambda =h/mv =h/p[/tex]).

For example, when the orbital is elliptical, we divide the electron's movement into the two directions at short time intervals.

The [tex]\perp[/tex] is the direction of the angular momentum(tangential), and the [tex]r[/tex] is the radial direction.
The two directions are rectangular at each point.

[tex]\oint p_{\perp} dq_{\perp} = n_{1}h, \qquad \oint p_{r} dq_{r} = n_{2}h[/tex]

At each point, the de Broglie's wavelengths are [tex]\lambda_{\perp}= h/p_{\perp}, \lambda_{r}= h/p_{r}[/tex]
The wavelengths are changing at each point. So, the above equations are equal to,

[tex]\oint dq_{\perp}/\lambda_{\perp} = n_{1}, \qquad \oint dq_{r}/\lambda_{r}= n_{2}[/tex]

This means that in the Bohr-Sommerfeld model, the sum of the number of the de Broglie's waves contained in each short segment becomes a interger.

In the case of the three-dimensional system or more complex system, we had better use the computer or something, I think.
 
Last edited:


Sorry. I should have added one more thing in the above statement(#2).

I divided the electron's motion into the two directions which are rectangular at each point on the elliptical orbital.

But actually the electron is moving in one direction.
And its momentum [tex]p[/tex] satisfies [tex]p^2 = p_{\perp}^2 + p_{r}^2[/tex] at each point.

So in a short time([tex]dt[/tex]), the electron moves [tex]dq=\frac{p}{m} dt[/tex].
Of course this satisfies,

[tex]dq^2 = dq_{\perp}^2 + dq_{r}^2[/tex]

The number of de Broglie's waves ([tex]\lambda[/tex] in length) contained in the short segment([tex]dq[/tex]) is,

[tex]dq/\lambda=dq/(\frac{h}{p})=p dq /h = p^2dt /hm[/tex]

As I said above, due to [tex]p^2 = p_{\perp}^2 + p_{r}^2[/tex], we arrive at the following relation,

[tex]dq /\lambda = dq_{\perp}/\lambda_{\perp} + dq_{r}/\lambda_{r}[/tex]

As a result, the number of de Broglie's waves contained in one-round of the orbital satisfies,

[tex]n = n_{1} + n_{2}[/tex]

For example, in the energy level (n=2) of the hydrogen(the Bohr model), there are two patterns as follows,
n1=1, n2=1 ----- elliptical (angular momentum=1)
n1=2, n2=0 ----- circular (angular momentum =2)