Boiler volume for specific steam turbine?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the necessary boiler volume for a steam turbine, focusing on the design and specifications of the boiler in relation to the heat source being used. Participants explore the relationship between boiler capacity, heat exchange surface area, and the specifics of the heating method employed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand the volume of the boiler required to operate a steam turbine effectively, providing specific operational parameters.
  • Another participant argues that boiler volume is not the critical factor; instead, the surface area for heat exchange is more relevant to the design.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for clarity on how the boiler will be heated, suggesting that the heating method will influence the boiler's design.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety and feasibility of the participant's project, particularly regarding the implications of designing a steam power system without sufficient knowledge.
  • One participant expresses interest in using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) fluids instead of water, noting their potential advantages in terms of lower operational temperatures.
  • Another participant challenges the claim that the heating elements can produce more wattage of heat than the electricity they consume, citing the law of conservation of energy.
  • There is a reiteration of the original question about boiler volume, with a participant clarifying their focus on volume rather than physical size.
  • One participant expresses openness to critique and acknowledges potential misunderstandings in their approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the relevance of boiler volume versus surface area and the feasibility of the proposed heating method. There is no consensus on the correct approach to determining the boiler specifications or the safety of the project.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the calculations and assumptions related to energy efficiency and the implications of using ORC fluids. The discussion also highlights the potential dangers associated with designing and building a steam power system without adequate knowledge.

Golani51
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
New here, hope someone can help.

I'm experimenting with a heat source for a steam turbine. I have the specs for the turbine and the necessary conditions for operation, but at this point in my design I need to figure out the volume of the actual boiler/reservoir. A direct answer or the right equation would be infinitely helpful. Thanks in advance!

Specs:
Superheated steam 10- 12 bars abs. 200-220 degrees C
Steam consumption: .04kg/second
basic steam rate: 9.8kg/kwh
Other useful I formation: For the 15 kW you will need a steam boiler of minimum 150 kW / 160 kW / 180 kg/h.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Volume isn't really a relevant parameter for a boiler; what matters is surface area of heat exchange. It sounds like you are saying you are designing this boiler from the ground-up and heating using a heat source of your own design. The nature and capacity of your heat source will determine what the boiler should look like.
 
My heat source can be tailored to the exact temperature needed to run the turbine. What I need in order to design and manufacture it is the size of boiler needed at the optimum temperature etc. I can adjust the heat source to whatever is necessary, but in order to build the boiler I need to know the minimal size needed to run the turbine. (Based on the requirements listed previously.)
 
Golani51 said:
My heat source can be tailored to the exact temperature needed to run the turbine.
That's great: and you gave the steam flow rate and pressure/temperature, so we know the required capacity of the boiler. But again:
...but in order to build the boiler I need to know the minimal size needed to run the turbine. (Based on the requirements listed previously.)
Again, physical size is not directly related to capacity. For example, a gas fired boiler is much, much larger than an electric boiler of the same capacity (example, in the capacity range you need, about the size of a refrigerator: http://www.cleaverbrooks.com/Products-and-Solutions/Boilers/Electric/Model-CR/Index.aspx ). You will need to design the boiler based on how you intend to heat it. So: how exactly do you intend to heat it?

Edit: Also, please note that boilers and steam power systems are very dangerous. Due to the level of knowledge that is implied by your question, we may have to close this thread for safety/liability reasons (right now it is a bit vague to know for sure what you are attempting...). If you really don't know what you are doing and you are attempting to design/build your own steam power plant, I urge you to reconsider. People die this way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and Bystander
Forgive my wording. I meant volume. I'm not as concerned about the actual physical size. That will end up being a factor of the design itself. Once I know the volume necessary for fluid heated to the proper temperature to run the turbine, I can move forward.

My design is electric in nature. The reason I need to know volume, is so I can determine if the electricity needed to run my heating elements is more or less than what the 15kw generator can produce. My heating elements produce much more wattage of heat than electricity they use. I'm fuzzy on the math, but this has been the focus of a lot of my research.

I'm also curious about using ORC fluids in place of water for the steam. From what I've found, ORC turbines can run on much lower temperatures than steam turbines.

In fact, adding something like acetone to water reduces its boiling temperature significantly. From what I have read it also bonds with the water atoms unlike alcohols and the like. Using such a mixture as a working fluid for the turbine would require less heat, and less wattage, without the difficulties associated with distillation of the mixture.

If I'm totally crawling down the wrong path I'm absolutely open to critiquing from those who know better. That's why I'm here.
 
My heating elements produce much more wattage of heat than electricity they use.

That defies the law of conservation of energy.
Perpetual motion machines are science fiction and are a banned topic here at PF.
 
I forgot to add "under the right circumstances." This is why I was hesitant to explain my heat source. My original question still stands, despite the science fiction.
 
Golani51 said:
Forgive my wording. I meant volume. I'm not as concerned about the actual physical size.
I know you meant volume - I said volume. You really aren't listening and we are going around in circles. Furthermore:

My heating elements produce much more wattage of heat than electricity they use.
This is impossible and since you are "fuzzy on the math", probably just an error on your part. This thread is closed for three reasons:

1. It is non-productive because you aren't listening to what you are being told.
2. We don't discuss perpetual motion here.
3. This is dangerous for someone with your level of knowledge to attempt and for liability and safety reasons we can't be a part of it.

I'm fuzzy on the math, but this has been the focus of a lot of my research.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K