Chemistry Bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals

AI Thread Summary
Bonding molecular orbitals result from constructive interference of atomic orbitals, which increases electron density between the nuclei, enhancing molecular stability. In contrast, antibonding orbitals arise from destructive interference, leading to decreased electron density between the nuclei and increased repulsion. The combination of bonding orbitals increases the wave function's amplitude, contributing to the overall stability of the molecule. This process is explained through the Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) method, where atomic orbitals combine to form molecular orbitals. Ultimately, the bonding orbitals effectively hold the molecule together, while antibonding orbitals do not contribute to this stability.
henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
Not a homework question, just curious. My book says that bonding orbitals from from constructive interference while antibonding orbitals from destructive interference. Since constructive interference increases amplitude, what increases in amplitude from the combination of bonding orbitals? It can't be energy because bonding orbitals are lower in energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stability? What actually happens is that the bonding orbitals formed by constructive interference is formed between the nuclei of the reacting atoms/molecules.. so they hold the molecule together increasing stability! whereas antibonding is away from both nuclei, hence not helping in holding the molecule together!
 
henry3369 said:
Since constructive interference increases amplitude, what increases in amplitude from the combination of bonding orbitals?
The wave function.

The statement stems from building molecular orbitals (MO) by the Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) method, where you would take an orbital (##\phi##) on each atom and make a linear combination to build the MO (##\psi##). For two atoms A and B, you get
$$
\begin{align}
\psi_+ &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \phi_A +\phi_B \right) \\
\psi_- &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \phi_A - \phi_B \right)
\end{align}
$$
In the case of ##\psi_+## you get "constructive interference," as the two atomic orbitals ##\phi## add up, and "destructive interference" for ##\psi_-##. As the atomic orbitals are centered on different atoms, this interference takes place in between the atoms, such that the electron density is increased (##\psi_+##) or decreased and has a node (##\psi_-##) between the nuclei, leading to a reduction or an increase in the nuclear Coulomb repulsion, respectively.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top