Bone CompressionTension problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaka23h
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the stretch of a bone under tensile force after determining its compression under a given force. The relevant formula involves Young's Modulus, but the absence of cross-sectional area complicates the calculation. Participants clarify that the problem can be approached proportionally, using the relationship between the compression and tensile Young's Modulus values. The solution involves setting the equations for both states equal to each other to find the change in length during tension. Ultimately, the problem is simplified by recognizing that the same force magnitude applies to both compression and tension scenarios.
shaka23h
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
When subjected to a force of compression, the length of a bone (compression Young's modulus 9.4 x 109 N/m2, tensile Young's modulus 1.6 x 1010 N/m2) decreases by 3.7 x 10-5 m. When this same bone is subjected to a tensile force of the same magnitude, by how much does it stretch


Ok after carefully looking at this problem I realized that the formula that would apply here would be

F = Y (delta L/ L0 ) A

Where y = young's Modulus Delta L = change in length and A = cross sectional area. But after looking at this problem I realized that there is no cross sectional area given, therefore I'm thinking that it is just a proportional problem.

It seems like I'm making this problem a bit harder then it actually is. Perhaps I'm missing something important?

I know that Tensile force is opposite Compression but in this case the answer would not just be the negative change in length right?

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ya pleaseexplain even i did not understand
 
force magnitude, initial length and cross sectional area are the same both times. differs only Y and delta L.
 
ok I got it thanks :) just had to set Y1 delta L = Y2 (x) and solve for X. You see I knew I was thinking about this problem a bit too hard LOL.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top