Suggestion Book reviews at the library?

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a dedicated platform within Physics Forums (PF) for users to review and discuss math and science books. The current Science book forum is seen as inadequate for posting reviews, as it primarily facilitates questions about book recommendations. The suggestion is to expand the existing library by creating specific categories for different subjects, allowing users to contribute their reviews and experiences with various books. This would help build a comprehensive database of quality science literature based on user feedback. Implementing such a feature could enhance the learning resources available to the community.
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,169
Reaction score
3,327
I've been making some blogs on suggestions for math books (I only have one blog up at the moment, but more should be coming), and somehow I feel that this is an aspect that is missing from PF.

To clarify: I would like a place in PF where we enter data for books and where everybody can then give their review on whether they liked the book or not, and what the problems were. That way, we can build a database filled with data of good science books and with reviews from PF-users.

I know about the Science book forum (https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21 ), but somehow I don't think that meets the purpose. I see the science book forum as a place where people can ask questions about which book they should read, etc. But not as a place to post reviews of books. Furthermore, the science book forum isn't alphabetically ordered like the library.

So, my suggestion is to extend the library so we can also discuss science books there. This shouldn't be too difficult: just creating a new category on math book, physics book, etc. should do the trick.

And yes: if such a functionality should exist, then I would certainly contribute to it.

I hope my post is clear enough :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps a Library section in Learning Materials, simply add a Book Review under the appropriate LM section.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Sticky
3
Replies
134
Views
28K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top