- #1

- 50

- 2

It should not have any integrals.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Intro Physics
- Thread starter sea333
- Start date

In summary: So you don't think that choosing a good book or video lecture is important?No, I think it is more important to be curious, willing to learn, and ambitious than it is to choose a nice book or video lecture.

- #1

- 50

- 2

It should not have any integrals.

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

- 18,994

- 23,916

https://openstax.org/details/books/physics

or some others from

https://openstax.org/subjects

- #3

- 50

- 2

Is there a good "classic" book available?

- #4

- 18,994

- 23,916

Probably more than one, but I do not know the market of those. OpenStax has a big advantage in that you can have a real close look at whether it matches your needs beforehand! And you can order a print copy!sea333 said:Is there a good "classic" book available?

- #5

- 6,842

- 2,282

https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1119/1.2342074?class=pdf&journalCode=pte

These are teacher resources:

https://aapt.org/Resources/upload/Quad1.pdf

...

https://aapt.org/Resources/upload/Quad5.pdf (Electricity)

https://aapt.org/Resources/upload/Quad6.pdf (Magnetism)

https://aapt.org/Resources/upload/Quad7.pdf

See also: a playlist... of the high-school version

Some interesting info at:

https://phyzblog.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-mechanical-universe-high-school.html

- #6

Gold Member

- 1,522

- 1,828

You want to search for algebra based physics.

- #7

- 24,492

- 15,004

I cannot recommend any such book. To the contrary, I'd strongly decline to use such a book. Physics without calculus is incomprehensible to begin with. The most bad of all didactical sins is the invention of what's called "calculus-free physics".sea333 said:

It should not have any integrals.

- #8

- 1,033

- 970

So you want high school students to know vector calculus? Or not to teach them physics?

- #9

- 24,492

- 15,004

- #10

- 1,033

- 970

vanhees71 said:but we learned E&M at high-school using line, surface, and volume integrals.

Well, in polish high-school people only learn derivatives and that is during last year. And as a high-school teacher I can assure you you can do a lot without calculus. Of course you can't derive e.g. formula for magnetic induction of an infinite line with a current, but you can use this formula in different exercises. In polish physics olympiad there are a lot of problems that of course can be easily dealt with calculus, but also can be dealt without it, by using some fancy reasoning. That's how you check if someone understands the physics, not just know how to do an integral or derivative. For example consider two bodies moving on a straight non-parallel lines. What is the shortest distance between them? You can use derivatives, but also you can just change your frame of reference to one in which one of the bodies is at rest and then calculate the distance between this body and a line on which the other one is moving

- #11

- 50

- 2

weirdoguy said:Well, in polish high-school people only learn derivatives and that is during last year. And as a high-school teacher I can assure you you can do a lot without calculus. Of course you can't derive e.g. formula for magnetic induction of an infinite line with a current, but you can use this formula in different exercises. In polish physics olympiad there are a lot of problems that of course can be easily dealt with calculus, but also can be dealt without it, by using some fancy reasoning. That's how you check if someone understands the physics, not just know how to do an integral or derivative. For example consider two bodies moving on a straight non-parallel lines. What is the shortest distance between them? You can use derivatives, but also you can just change your frame of reference to one in which one of the bodies is at rest and then calculate the distance between this body and a line on which the other one is moving

If you are a high-school teacher can't you recommend a few books?

- #12

- 1,033

- 970

- #13

- 50

- 2

so you can't recommend to your students any English books?

- #14

- 1,033

- 970

- #15

- 50

- 2

I am mainly looking for some modern book with media links in the book.

- #16

- 18,994

- 23,916

It is by far more important to be curious, willing to learn, and ambitious than it is to choose a nice book or video lecture. And in my opinion, pencil and paper are more important than fancy youtube clips. It sticks more if you write it yourself, rather than enjoying the movie.sea333 said:I am mainly looking for some modern book with media links in the book.

- #17

- 1,033

- 970

fresh_42 said:And in my opinion, pencil and paper are more important than fancy youtube clips.

And that is why I think that older, "black and white", versions of Halliday&Resnick are better

- #18

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,603

- 3,227

OTOH, I was taught Calculus first. So maybe there is an alternate treatment of EM that is beyond my imagination.

- #19

Gold Member

- 1,522

- 1,828

- #20

- 1,033

- 970

DaveE said:Why do you want to teach EM before students have the tools to learn it easily or correctly?

Because that is what polish educational system forces me to do, and also I do not think that you need calculus to grasp Coulomb's law, what is an electric field, superposition of fields, capacitors and movement of charges in an electric field of a capacitor, electric potential energy, and other topics.

Polish high school starts when children are at the age of 15 and lasts for four years. I'm glad that you all were taught vector calculus at that age but I don't think that it is a good idea in the reality of my country. And I don't think you can't teach anything without caluculus. I do that for 12 years now and I can assure you it's hard for children even without calculus. I learned vector calculus during my first year at the university and had two courses on electrodynamics - basic taught by experimental physicsts and then the second, one more theoretical (that one was the hardest lecture during bechelor studies). And I'm glad that I learned the non-calculus basics first.

DaveE said:What are the chances that whatever you teach them, they will just have to relearn later with better tools?

100%, because they will learn proper calculus when they go to univrsity or polytechnic and then they will learn calculus based physics.

I really do have a feeling that some of you mix up high-school with upper level, univeristy-like studies

- #21

- 24,492

- 15,004

I also can't believe that in Poland there is really no calculus involved in high-school physics. Even in Germany, where the quality has monotonously decreased within the recent years, there's still some use of high-school calculus in physics.

- #22

- 24,492

- 15,004

?

- #23

- 1,033

- 970

vanhees71 said:I also can't believe that in Poland there is really no calculus involved in high-school physics.

Welcome to my beautiful country Where the government is more focused on financing church than on education. For quite a long time there was completely nothing from calculus. Derivatives were added back to math curriculum in 2015, and are taught in the last grade. I know that in the 80's even differential equations and complex numbers were taught. Good old days...

- #24

- 24,492

- 15,004

- #25

- #26

- 317

- 479

vanhees71 said:

I also can't believe that in Poland there is really no calculus involved in high-school physics. Even in Germany, where the quality has monotonously decreased within the recent years, there's still some use of high-school calculus in physics.

Here in Canada, provincial governments have responsibility for education, so each province varies, but not by much. I am not sure of any province that includes calculus in its physics courses. In Alberta there certainly isn't any.vanhees71 said:

Books for high school physics E&M typically cover topics such as electric and magnetic fields, electric potential, capacitance, resistance, and circuits.

Yes, these books are specifically designed for high school students and do not require prior knowledge of calculus or integrals. The material is presented in a way that is accessible and understandable for students at this level.

Yes, there are many books available that cover high school physics E&M without the use of integrals. Some popular options include "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Giancoli and "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday and Resnick.

These books are a great resource for preparing for standardized tests, as they cover all the necessary topics and provide practice problems and review materials. It is also recommended to supplement with other study materials and practice tests to ensure thorough preparation.

These books can be used for self-study, but it is recommended to have a teacher or tutor available for clarification and guidance. Additionally, working through practice problems and seeking help when needed can greatly enhance understanding and retention of the material.

Share:

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 888

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 758

Classical
Physics books for me!

- Replies
- 19

- Views
- 1K

Intro Physics
High School Physics and Math books for self-studying?

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 4K

Classical
Advice on Algebra for High School

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K