Books on Analysis and Linear Algebra

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the book "Introduction to Calculus & Analysis - Volume 1" by Richard Courant, which is highly regarded for its depth and clarity, although it has been noted that Courant presents a weaker version of the fundamental theorem of calculus. This approach is attributed to the order in which he introduces concepts, focusing on integral calculus before differentiation. For linear algebra, recommendations include Shilov's book, which may be challenging for beginners without prior knowledge, and "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler, which is suitable for those new to abstract linear algebra. The conversation also touches on the suitability of these texts for high school students and those transitioning to university-level mathematics.
JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1
I just bought "Introduction to Calculus & Analysis - Volume 1" by Richard Courant. I am also looking for a good book on Linear Algebra.

1) Is the Courant book (I ordered it from the internet so I didn't get it yet) good?

2) What good books on Linear Algebra are there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should be moved to the Science Books Review sections. In any case, Courant is excellent. I have yet to find an introductory book at its level. I have one an only one complaint about Courant: he presents a "weak" version of the fundamental theorem of calculus, only considering continuous integrands. I think this is due to the unavailability of the mean value theorem of differential calculus at the time he presents the theorem (he develops the integral calculus before differentiation), which is usually used to prove the stronger version. For linear algebra, have a look at Shilov.
 
'Linear Algebra Done Right' by Sheldon Axler is a good book for a first course in abstract linear algebra.
 
Is the Linear Algebra book by Shilov meant for first year undergraduate? Or does it require prior knowledge of linear algebra?
 
It's hard for me to say. My class (Advanced Linear Algebra 1) uses Friedberg, which I find inferior to Shilov. It's difficult to jump head first into Shilov's book without any prior exposure to some concepts from algebra. Are you a HS student? Have you read through university math literature before?
 
I just finished HS. I'm currently working through Introduction to Calculus and Analysis by Courant.
 
Then I suppose Shilov is a bit too advanced. It's inexpensive though, so you, if you want to try it, go for it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top