Borehole / Ground penetrating radar research opportunities

AI Thread Summary
Research opportunities in ground penetrating radar (GPR) and borehole radar focus on improving data analysis, processing, and interpretation techniques. GPR is utilized for subsurface surveys, including locating buried objects, assessing soil properties, and conducting geotechnical investigations. While GPR is valuable for preliminary research, traditional in-situ methods are often preferred for large-scale projects due to perceived reliability issues. The discussion highlights the need for advancements in GPR methodologies to enhance their application in geotechnical contexts. A referenced paper outlines the limitations of geophysical methods in subsurface exploration, emphasizing the importance of addressing these challenges.
behold
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi Members

I am preparing to do a presentation on possible research opportunities in ground penetrating radar before an Industry and academic audience. Anyone with information as to what is lacking or needs improvement in current BH or GPR research in the context of Data analysis (processing and interpretation)?

Regrs

Behold
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
you mean general Geotechnical exploration tools?
 
Research opportunities in gpr/borehole radar

Yes, Geotechnical exploration is part of applications of ground penetrating radar and/or borehole radar- This is actaully a specialised geophysics technique used for the following:

Subsurface surveys eg finding buried landmines, minerals, cavities, underground water, soil property investigations, even geotechnical investigations such as bridge decks, tunnel investigations, concrete integrity assessment

GPR/Radar based on timing and imaging electromagnetic waves that reflect on interfaces or objects with a change of electrical properties compared to surrounding medium. There are several other techniques eg those that use artificial shock/sesmic waves
to explore the Earth subsurface

Thanks

Behold
 
Last edited:
I am not familiar with this geophysics procedure. In general, in large scale projects it is preferred digging holes, method with thin walled tubes, rotatory methods for rocks, and the like (in-situ methods) over geophysical methods (sismic, electric resistivity, magnetic and/or gravimetric).

I am not saying geophysical methods are not used. They are, mainly for preliminary research, but the information they provide is not seen as reliable as others and is never enough for a project (such as foundation design).
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Back
Top