Borehole / Ground penetrating radar research opportunities

AI Thread Summary
Research opportunities in ground penetrating radar (GPR) and borehole radar focus on improving data analysis, processing, and interpretation techniques. GPR is utilized for subsurface surveys, including locating buried objects, assessing soil properties, and conducting geotechnical investigations. While GPR is valuable for preliminary research, traditional in-situ methods are often preferred for large-scale projects due to perceived reliability issues. The discussion highlights the need for advancements in GPR methodologies to enhance their application in geotechnical contexts. A referenced paper outlines the limitations of geophysical methods in subsurface exploration, emphasizing the importance of addressing these challenges.
behold
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi Members

I am preparing to do a presentation on possible research opportunities in ground penetrating radar before an Industry and academic audience. Anyone with information as to what is lacking or needs improvement in current BH or GPR research in the context of Data analysis (processing and interpretation)?

Regrs

Behold
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
you mean general Geotechnical exploration tools?
 
Research opportunities in gpr/borehole radar

Yes, Geotechnical exploration is part of applications of ground penetrating radar and/or borehole radar- This is actaully a specialised geophysics technique used for the following:

Subsurface surveys eg finding buried landmines, minerals, cavities, underground water, soil property investigations, even geotechnical investigations such as bridge decks, tunnel investigations, concrete integrity assessment

GPR/Radar based on timing and imaging electromagnetic waves that reflect on interfaces or objects with a change of electrical properties compared to surrounding medium. There are several other techniques eg those that use artificial shock/sesmic waves
to explore the Earth subsurface

Thanks

Behold
 
Last edited:
I am not familiar with this geophysics procedure. In general, in large scale projects it is preferred digging holes, method with thin walled tubes, rotatory methods for rocks, and the like (in-situ methods) over geophysical methods (sismic, electric resistivity, magnetic and/or gravimetric).

I am not saying geophysical methods are not used. They are, mainly for preliminary research, but the information they provide is not seen as reliable as others and is never enough for a project (such as foundation design).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Back
Top