Boundary condition for Maxwell equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 5K views
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
It's obvious that if Maxwell equations are fulfilled by some [tex]E(x,y,z,t)[/tex]
and [tex]B(x,y,z,t)[/tex], they are also fullfiled by [tex]E(x,y,z,t)+ E_0[/tex]
and [tex]B(x,y,z,t)+B_0[/tex], where [tex]E_0[/tex] and [tex]B_0[/tex]
are constants. This freedom has physical significance as it changes the Lorentz force
which act on a charge. It implies that together with Maxwell equation we should
give some boundary condition. But unfortunately I can't find any book where they are
explicitly given (Dirichlet and Neumann boundary condition are most often introduced for
equation for potential not field).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But the E and B fields CAN be transformed into their respective potential fields. That's why we only use potential and the Dirichlet/Neumann boundary conditions. In fact, in many instances, one applies the Green's function with the boundary conditions. That, in principle, should completely define the field problem.

Edit: er.. never mind. I just realized that you have a time-dependence field.

Zz.
 
It depends on the problem. If it is free-space, then there is an implicit requirement that the fields must go to zero at infinity for uniqueness to be guaranteed (Sommerfeld Radiation Condition). If you have a discontinuous permeability and/or permittivity then you can deduce the boundary conditions from the partial differential equations themselves.

Weng Cho Chew's "Fields and Waves in Inhomogeneous Media" discusses both.