Boundary conditions in String Theory

GargleBlast42
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I have this, probably quite simple, problem. In the RNS superstring, when varying the action, we obtain in general a term \int d\tau [X'_{\mu}\delta X^{\mu}|_{\sigma=\pi}-X'_{\mu}\delta X^{\mu}|_{\sigma=0} + (\psi_+ \delta \psi_+ - \psi_- \delta \psi_-)|_{\sigma=\pi}-(\psi_+ \delta \psi_+ - \psi_- \delta \psi_-)|_{\sigma=0}], where the notation should be standard (as e.g. in Becker-Becker-Schwarz).

My question is the following: couldn't one also take other boundary conditions as those that one takes usually? For example, couldn't X^{\mu} be anti-periodic (i.e. an antiperiodic closed string), or cuoldn't we take a boundary condition for the fermion in the form \delta \psi_+=\delta \psi_-=0? Can one show that there are no solutions to such boundary conditions (because nobody does that in a textbook)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry for bumping this, but I would at least like to know, if it is too difficult to answer (i.e. nobody has been considering such boundary conditions), or is it just that it's so obvious, that it's not worth replying to :-)? Thank you for any ideas.
 
Much beyond my pay grade...boundary conditions can be rather esoteric...somebody may yet answer,

good luck...
 
You cannot set \delta \psi_+ = \delta \psi_- = 0, because the entire point of varying the action is that the variations of the fields are generic (i.e., nonzero).

Also, X^\mu cannot be antiperiodic, because it is just an ordinary number. Either the string is closed or it isn't. Remember that X^\mu simply describes the string's position/configuration in spacetime.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
You cannot set \delta \psi_+ = \delta \psi_- = 0, because the entire point of varying the action is that the variations of the fields are generic (i.e., nonzero).

Also, X^\mu cannot be antiperiodic, because it is just an ordinary number. Either the string is closed or it isn't. Remember that X^\mu simply describes the string's position/configuration in spacetime.

Sorry, I meant of course \delta \psi_+|_{\sigma=0/\pi} = \delta \psi_-|_{\sigma=0/\pi} = 0.

With the antiperiodicity - well yes, you couldn't interpret the X's as space-time dimensions, but from the point of view of the 2D Field Theory it would be okay, right?
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top