Boundary Problem: Massless String with Knot of Mass 'm' at z=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorazine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Massless String
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a wave incident on a boundary problem involving a mass 'm' at z = 0, with a massless string on the other side. The key boundary conditions are that the string must be continuous and that the force balance at the boundary is described by the equation T*[df(+) - df(-)] = m*d^2f/dz^2. The original poster, Thorazine, initially considered letting df(+) equal zero due to the absence of force from the massless side but found this approach ineffective. Another participant, arcnets, agrees that df/dz should be zero in the massless region but questions why Thorazine's approach fails to yield correct results. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying boundary conditions in wave mechanics, particularly when dealing with massless systems.
Thorazine
So I have a wave incident on a boundary problem. The incidence is normal and the boundary is a knot of mass 'm' at z = 0, with the wave coming from minus infinity. The problem is that the string on the other side is massless, and I can't figure out exactly how that effects the boundary conditions. I know the string must be continuous as the first condition, and:

T*[df(+) - df(-)] = m*d^2f/dz^2

as the second condition. Where df(+) is the first derivative on the positive side of z = 0 and df(-) is the derivative on the negative side.

What I thought to do was let df(+) = 0 because there is no force coming from that side, but that hasn't worked. I also tried letting the transmitted wave be imaginary only because without mass I can't see how a string could vibrate, and that didn't work either. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Thorazine
What I thought to do was let df(+) = 0 because there is no force coming from that side...

Thorazine, I think this is physically correct. I think df/dz=0 everywhere in the massless part. Could you please explain why it doesn't work?
 
I could be wrong but shouldn't the equation be:

m*[df(+) - df(-)]/dz = T*(d^2f/dz^2)


Maybe?
 


Originally posted by arcnets
Thorazine, I think this is physically correct. I think df/dz=0 everywhere in the massless part. Could you please explain why it doesn't work?

I know it's not correct because it doesn't give me the right answer, I don't know why it doesn't work. :)
 
Back
Top