Bowling Question - Rotational Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bowling ball projected horizontally that transitions from slipping to rolling without slipping due to kinetic friction. The user correctly calculated the linear and angular acceleration and is exploring the relationship between distance traveled and the equations of motion. They combined two equations to find the distance the ball skidded, equating it to 9.5 meters, which is half the length of the bowling alley. The user derived a coefficient of kinetic friction (μk) of approximately 0.0995 and seeks confirmation on the validity of their approach. The calculations and method used appear to be physically sound for solving the problem.
gingerelle
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform, spherical bowling ball of mass m and radius R is projected horizontally along the
floor at an initial velocity v0 = 6.00 m/s. The ball is not rotating initially, so w0 = 0. It
picks up rotation due to (kinetic) friction as it initially slips along the floor. The coefficient of
kinetic friction between the ball and the floor is μk. After a time ts, the ball stops slipping and makes a transition to rolling without slipping at angular speed w(s) and translational velocity v(s).
Thereafter, it rolls without slipping at constant velocity.

If a standard bowling alley is 19.0 m long and the ball slips for half its length, what is the
value of μk?

Homework Equations



1]]] L = Iw
2]]] F = ma
3]]] Torque = r cross F
4]]] x(f) = x(initial) + v0t + 1/2at^2
5]]] theta(f) = theta (i) + w(0)t + 1/2angularacceleration(t^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



So, basically, I found the linear acceleration equation and the angular acceleration of the ball, as well as Ts (and I know these answers are correct). But I just wanted to check if I'm allowed to do the following:

I added equation 4 and equation 5 together, and made it equal to 9.5 metres. But before that, I converted equation 5 into metres by multiplying both sides by (pi X R)/180 degrees ...since 360 degrees turn = 1 circumference travelled.

after I did that, I just subbed time (Ts) equation in (from what I calculated before) and when I isolated uk, I got around 0.0995 (coefficient of friction). But basically, I was just wondering if that's...physically correct..adding the two equations and making it equal 9.5m (half of 19.0 metres, which is the distance that the ball skidded for). thanks and please reply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gingerelle said:

Homework Statement



A uniform, spherical bowling ball of mass m and radius R is projected horizontally along the
floor at an initial velocity v0 = 6.00 m/s. The ball is not rotating initially, so w0 = 0. It
picks up rotation due to (kinetic) friction as it initially slips along the floor. The coefficient of
kinetic friction between the ball and the floor is μk. After a time ts, the ball stops slipping and makes a transition to rolling without slipping at angular speed w(s) and translational velocity v(s).
Thereafter, it rolls without slipping at constant velocity.

If a standard bowling alley is 19.0 m long and the ball slips for half its length, what is the
value of μk?

Homework Equations



1]]] L = Iw
2]]] F = ma
3]]] Torque = r cross F
4]]] x(f) = x(initial) + v0t + 1/2at^2
5]]] theta(f) = theta (i) + w(0)t + 1/2angularacceleration(t^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



So, basically, I found the linear acceleration equation and the angular acceleration of the ball, as well as Ts (and I know these answers are correct). But I just wanted to check if I'm allowed to do the following:

I added equation 4 and equation 5 together, and made it equal to 9.5 metres. But before that, I converted equation 5 into metres by multiplying both sides by (pi X R)/180 degrees ...since 360 degrees turn = 1 circumference travelled.

after I did that, I just subbed time (Ts) equation in (from what I calculated before) and when I isolated uk, I got around 0.0995 (coefficient of friction). But basically, I was just wondering if that's...physically correct..adding the two equations and making it equal 9.5m (half of 19.0 metres, which is the distance that the ball skidded for). thanks and please reply.

\vec{v}_f^2=36m/s-19m\cdot\vec{a}. This final velocity is when it starts picking up angular velocity (id est, \vec{v}=\vec{r\omega}).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top