Breakedown of common sense and inertial ccordinate systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertial Systems
Minich
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
1. Let us consider a molecule with almost "zero" binding energy. Why does every textbook declare that it should be a molecule if we accelerate it to some high velocity? Why shouldn't it dissociate at some velocity.
2. Inversly. Consider a molecule moving with some velocity. Why it couldn't dissociate at zero velocity?

3. Why such questions? May a molecule size be a length unit? And binding energy energy unit?

Accelaration always change the state of the system. How is it, that after acceleration the inertial system, connected with molecule, is equivalent to initial nonmoving system?

Why so childish hypothesis is accepted and adopted?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Minich said:
Why so childish hypothesis is accepted and adopted?
Because it agrees with every experiment yet devised to test it.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top