A Bremsstrahlung single photon or spectrum

gjj
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
A single collision between an electron and heavy ion produces a continuous range of frequencies in classical electrodynamics. In quantum electrodynamics that same situation produces a single photon. Which is it?
Non-relativistic Bremsstrahlung is discussed classically in Rybicki “Radiative Processes in Astrophysics” where Larmor’s formula is used to find the power radiated in a collision between an electron and a Coulomb field. The Fourier transform of the pulse allows for a description of the pulse in terms of a distribution of frequencies. In Harris “A Pedestrian Approach to Quantum Field Theory” the same problem is attacked also in the non-relativistic case. Various approximations are used in both cases to make the calculations easier. The classical case results in a spectrum that consists of a continuous band of frequencies where each frequency band contributes roughly the same energy. The quantum case, in a first approximation produces a single photon of a given energy. Rybicki claims that both classical and quantum calculations are largely in agreement (a Gaunt factor makes the agreement better). How can there be agreement when we have a spectrum vs a single photon? Which is it, a spectrum or a photon? How do we show that a single photon has the Larmor energy predicted classically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gjj said:
Summary:: A single collision between an electron and heavy ion produces a continuous range of frequencies in classical electrodynamics. In quantum electrodynamics that same situation produces a single photon. Which is it?

Non-relativistic Bremsstrahlung is discussed classically in Rybicki “Radiative Processes in Astrophysics” where Larmor’s formula is used to find the power radiated in a collision between an electron and a Coulomb field. The Fourier transform of the pulse allows for a description of the pulse in terms of a distribution of frequencies. In Harris “A Pedestrian Approach to Quantum Field Theory” the same problem is attacked also in the non-relativistic case. Various approximations are used in both cases to make the calculations easier. The classical case results in a spectrum that consists of a continuous band of frequencies where each frequency band contributes roughly the same energy. The quantum case, in a first approximation produces a single photon of a given energy. Rybicki claims that both classical and quantum calculations are largely in agreement (a Gaunt factor makes the agreement better). How can there be agreement when we have a spectrum vs a single photon? Which is it, a spectrum or a photon? How do we show that a single photon has the Larmor energy predicted classically?
Quantum field theory does not predict that there is a single photon emitted. There is an infinity, with the total energy spread among them.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top