Bridge in the Context of A Spring.

  • Thread starter Thread starter las2vc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving tourists jumping on a poorly-designed bridge. The key question is whether the tourists are in equilibrium while their feet are still in contact with the bridge. It is clarified that they are indeed in equilibrium because they are not moving, maintaining a constant velocity of zero. The terminology of "static equilibrium" is introduced to articulate their state more clearly. Overall, the reasoning presented aligns with the principles of physics regarding equilibrium during the jump.
las2vc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We have weekly problem sets that lead us through a "story" of sorts. In this week's, a group of tourists are on a newly-built, albeit poorly-designed bridge. The question reads:

"The tourists bend their knees and, at the count of three, jump upward simultaneously. While their feet are in contact with the bridge, as they straighten out their legs during their jump, are the tourists in equilibrium? Why or why not?"

I know that equilibrium means to have a constant velocity. I was thinking that they WERE in equilibrium because even though they're accelerating upward (?), they're not moving and therefore their velocity is constant at zero until their feet leave the bridge. Does this make sense? Is that appropriate physics 'language'? It seems that I'm missing some key terminology or something that would make it sound more articulate.

Thanks!
Laura.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your reasoning is correct. The tourists are in equilibrium while their feet are in contact with the bridge, since they are not moving. You could say that the tourists are at rest and maintain a state of static equilibrium as they jump.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top