Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Brilliant integral calculation

  1. Nov 22, 2011 #1

    Office_Shredder

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I just saw this and thought that sometimes people can get a bit too carried away with their mathematical notation. Hope you enjoy!

    http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9690/weirdintegralcalculatio.jpg [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
    Office_Shredder, Nov 22, 2011
  2. jcsd
    Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org
  3. Nov 22, 2011 #2

    AlephZero

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    But that's the standard way that "real mathematicians" solve easy problems: show the problem is equivalent to a harder problem that has been solved already. :smile:
     
    AlephZero, Nov 22, 2011
  4. Nov 22, 2011 #3

    pwsnafu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The notation seems completely fine to me. What is excessive about it? The parenthesis around the 1/12?
     
    pwsnafu, Nov 22, 2011
  5. Nov 22, 2011 #4

    Number Nine

    User Avatar

    I don't think it's excessive. Certainly, multiplying everything out would make the integration dead simple, but his/her approach was pretty concise and interesting. Sometimes, a little extra complexity makes for a much more interesting argument (e.g. my favourite proof of the infinitude of prime numbers uses topology).
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
    Number Nine, Nov 22, 2011
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Brilliant integral calculation

  1. Why do you calculate the area UNDER a curve with integration? (Replies: 3)

  2. How can i calculate the attached integral? (Replies: 13)

  3. Calculation of the integral (Replies: 12)

  4. Area and volume calculation (no integration!)) (Replies: 1)

  5. Surface calculation (no integration!) (Replies: 7)

Loading...