Bubble of water in zero gravity

AI Thread Summary
In zero gravity, a bubble of water would maintain its shape due to surface tension, allowing it to hold together. Fish inside the bubble could potentially swim outside and suffocate, raising questions about their ability to return to the water. The discussion also speculates on whether a dolphin, capable of breathing air, could adapt to swimming through air in a zero-gravity environment. The dynamics of water and air in space present intriguing challenges for aquatic life. Overall, the conversation highlights the unique interactions between physics and biology in outer space.
Alltimegreat1
Messages
115
Reaction score
5
What if you were in a spaceship in outer space and had a sphere filled with water and some fish in it and then carefully removed the shell, leaving behind only a bubble of water. Would the water hold together and could the fish would swim outside the bubble and suffocate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alltimegreat1 said:
What if you were in a spaceship in outer space and had a sphere filled with water and some fish in it and then carefully removed the shell, leaving behind only a bubble of water. Would the water hold together..
Yes, because of surface tension. You can find videos of this.

Alltimegreat1 said:
...and would could the fish would swim outside the bubble and suffocate?
This could happen. An interesting question would be, if it can swim back to the water through the air. Or if a dolphin, which can breathe air, would learn to swim through air in zero-g.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top