Buddhism: Question of Consciousness Reincarnation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anubis
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of reincarnation in Buddhism and its implications regarding the origins of consciousness. It raises a philosophical question similar to challenges posed by atheists to Christians about the notion of a beginning. The argument suggests that if reincarnation is valid, one must consider how consciousness began its cycle, referencing conservation of angular momentum to argue against the idea of a true beginning. The conversation contrasts this with Judeo-Christian beliefs, where God creates everything, questioning the existence of a true beginning since God is eternal. It highlights the human tendency to perceive existence as linear, making it difficult to grasp the idea of a beginningless existence. Some participants note that from a spiritual perspective, the specifics may be less important, while others argue that reincarnation is a religious doctrine that doesn't need to adhere to philosophical logic. The discussion concludes that such questions may be better suited for Buddhist teachings rather than broader philosophical discourse.
Anubis
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
the buddhism teaches us that our consciousness are reincarnated whenever we pass away. However, just like the problem posed by athiests to christians about the notation of a beginning, I too, have the same question. Suppose that buddhists are right and that reincarnation is the way to go, how did our consciousness went into rotation in the first place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By conservation of angular momentum.
 
There is no such thing as a true begining. In Judaism/christianity God creates everything in the begininning, but then this wasn't really the beginning, because god already existed and it seems impossible for there to be a beginning. This is similar to the buddhism problem. The reason that this problem exists is because Man always sees things as having a beginning and an end. It is hard for us to understand that existence cannot have a beginning. It's not an irrational idea though. The circle doesn't have a beginning or an end.
 
arildno said:
By conservation of angular momentum.
Very Zen, arildno. :smile: :cool:
 
From a spiritual point of view, it really doesn't matter. But believing such things, especially if you work in science or math, in my opinion, takes a degree of "Doublethink".
 
Reincarnation is a religious doctrine, not a philosophical concept. As such, it doesn't have to make sense.
 
Is that any harder to believe than a universe emerges from nothing, or one that bangs and collapses in eternal cycles?
 
Please see our policy on religious discussions. This is a question that is best left for buddhism in particular, rather than philosophy in general.
 
Back
Top