Building a Sand-Travelling Car that Fires a Projectile

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on building a sand-travelling car that can fire a projectile accurately after traveling 2 meters. The initial design faced challenges, as the car struggled to gain momentum on sand, despite modifications using retractable badge clips for elastic power. Suggestions included examining the friction between the vehicle and the sand, as well as considering the design of the wheels, which were initially ineffective. After switching to a bulldozer-style front end, the car improved its movement but lost turning control, affecting firing accuracy. The conversation emphasizes the need for further adjustments to balance propulsion and steering on sandy terrain.
Cryotube
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Build an elastic-powered or gravitational-powered car that traverses on sand for 2 meters, then fires a projectile perpendicular to the car into a target 2 meters away.

The car + projectile is marked based on:
Distance traveled before firing (as close as possible to 2 meters)
Firing accuracy
Weight of car (1 kg / (1 + mass))

The car must fit within 20 centimeters in both length and width of the dock
-It doesn't have to stop before firing

Homework Equations


-None really

The Attempt at a Solution


The current car I have built is only a base, but it refuses to run on sand at all.
-I used retractable badge clips as the source of elastic energy, instead of rubber bands.

The car runs perfectly fine on solid ground, but the sand is so fine that it resists all initial movement by the car so it simply can't build any momentum.

Even after modification and adding on a total of 3 retractable badge clips the car still can't muster enough power to begin running.

Any suggestions or advice would be highly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you determined where the friction is coming from? Is it because the vehicle has to climb out of the depressions in the sand? You didn't mention what the interface is between the vehicle and the sand. Is it wheels? Are the front wheels acting like snowplows?
 
I've modified the car so that it's running on both the nametags and rubber bands now. I've also switched out the back wheels for a bulldozer front end - like a giant ski.

It seems to work better (resists less) so it can run, but now I'm unable to control the turning of the car in the sand (it rotates slightly so the shot is now off)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top