Building a Solar-Powered Stirling Engine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the feasibility of building a solar-powered Stirling engine, highlighting the solar flux available on Earth, which is approximately 1350 watts/m². Participants compare the efficiency of Stirling engines to traditional solar panels, noting that Stirling engines are among the most efficient heat engines, while solar panels typically convert only about 10% of solar energy into electricity. The conversation also references advancements in photovoltaic technology, with the highest recorded efficiency for flexible solar cells at 15.9%. Overall, the discussion concludes that while Stirling engines are efficient, their practical application for generating significant power may be limited.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stirling engine mechanics
  • Knowledge of solar energy conversion principles
  • Familiarity with photovoltaic (PV) efficiency metrics
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics related to heat engines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of different Stirling engine designs
  • Explore advancements in photovoltaic technology and their efficiencies
  • Investigate the thermal conversion rates of solar energy
  • Learn about the practical applications and limitations of Stirling engines in renewable energy systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, renewable energy enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the comparative efficiency of solar technologies and heat engines.

RKD89
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys
I m trying to make a Stirling engine power by solar heat.
Somewhere I found out that the solar flux available on Earth is abt 1350watts/m2

Is this heat energy only or "heat & light " combined??


I m trying to find out if my soar engine will be better than traditional solar cells??

What is the energy conversion rate for solar panels/m2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Stirling engine is one of the most efficient heat engines known. It is doubtful if a solar panel (notoriously inefficient) would be anywhere near as good at converting heat directly into mechanical movement.

On the other hand, if you intend to run (say) an electric generator from your engine, forget it. The power developed by a model Stirling is amazingly low - it can barely keep itself running against friction.

Here's a vid of my own Stirling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtTz4X7Mi64"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RKD89 said:
Hi Guys
I m trying to make a Stirling engine power by solar heat.
Somewhere I found out that the solar flux available on Earth is abt 1350watts/m2

Is this heat energy only or "heat & light " combined??


I m trying to find out if my soar engine will be better than traditional solar cells??

What is the energy conversion rate for solar panels/m2?
The 1.35 kW/m2 refers to the light and would produce that thermal power if it could be converted to heat at 100% efficiency.

One could use 10% as a reasonable estimate of the efficiency of PVs.
http://www.examiner.com/green-techn...ic-efficiency-record-using-low-cost-materials

World's Highest Photovoltaic Energy Conversion Efficiency Among Monolithically Integrated Flexible Solar Cells = 15.9 %
http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=16822

There are apparently more efficient PV cells in the works.
http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18910/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K