Building theoretical model for phase seperation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formation of a solid phase ABC from elements A, B, and C under rapid heating and cooling, with the addition of a fourth element, D, leading to a two-phase solid (AB, CD). The phenomenon is thermodynamically favorable, suggesting a solubility limit in the solid phase that affects the chemical potential of the phases. The challenges include the extreme conditions required for the experiment, which are difficult to replicate in the lab, and the lack of existing phase diagrams and prior research on the A-B-C-D system. Suggestions for computational methods and resources to explore include shock tubes for simulating high temperatures and pressures, as well as specific models like the BGK model of the Boltzmann Equation. The importance of using standard units, such as Pascals for pressure, is also emphasized for consistency in research.
susdu
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I have three elements, A, B, C, that under certain conditions (rapid heating and cooling)
form one ABC phase solid. Sometimes when I add a fourth element, D, I get two phase (AB,CD) solid.
Obviously this phenomena is thermodynamically favourable. My guess (still undergraduate)
is that there is a solubility limit in the solid phase of these elements in a way that beyond a
certain amount of D, the chemical potential of the ABCD phase is higher than that of two-phase
solid.

I want to offer a model that will explain this phenomena. Problems are:
1. This is a process that occurs in high temperatures and pressure (4000K and 40,000psi in 1 millisecond) so it can't be easily reproduced in the lab.
2. I didn't find any phase diagrams of A-B-C-D and their combinations.
3. Prior research on the subject is almost non existent.

I really don't know where to start. This is not homework, it's a research project I'm interested in.
I'll appreciate any help/direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The conditions of your experiment are indeed difficult to reproduce in any laboratory! Some shock tubes for blast wave simulation have been operated at such temperatures and pressures, but are rare and expensive. An overview can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_tube

Here a powerful and high pressure system is described:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1105/1105.4670.pdf

Here is one computational method that possibly could be applicable:
“The Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook (BGK) model of the Boltzmann Equation”
http://www.math.ust.hk/~makxu/PAPER/aiaa-shock.pdf

One more computational method:
High temperature shock wave interaction in heavy gases - Computations
Bei Wang, Maryland, Univ., College Park; Harland Glaz, Maryland, Univ., College Park
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.1999-3577

May I suggest you use the units “Pascals” for pressure, and not psi? These units are used throughout the literature.
40 000 pound/square inch = 275 790 291.2 pascal, or 275.8 Mpa
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top