Bullet acceleration into moist clay

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bullet penetrating moist clay, with the initial speed of the bullet given as 367 m/s and the penetration distance as 0.0621 m. The goal is to determine the acceleration of the bullet during this process.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of average velocity versus initial velocity in calculating acceleration. The original poster attempts to use average velocity to find the time of penetration, leading to a different acceleration result. Questions arise regarding the appropriateness of using average velocity in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the differences between using average and initial velocity in their calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the correct application of initial velocity, but there is no explicit consensus on the reasoning behind the initial misunderstanding.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a typo regarding the exponent in the original answer, which may have contributed to confusion. The discussion reflects an initial misunderstanding of the problem setup and the variables involved.

thehitchcocks
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The problem:
A bullet is moving at a speed of 367 m/s when it embeds into a lump of moist clay. The bullet penetrates for a distance of 0.0621m. Determine the acceleration of the bullet while moving into the clay.


I can get the correct answer by using Vf2 = Vi2 + 2ad (result: -1.08*10-6 m/s2).

However, I'm trying to understand why an approach using the average velocity doesn't work (that's what I tried first). Can you help me understand what's wrong with the following approach? :

Vavg = (Vi + Vf)/2 = 183.5 m/s

t = d/v
t = 0.0621m / (183.5 m/s) = 0.00034s

d = Vit + 1/2at2
0.0621m = 183.5 m/s * 0.00034s + 1/2a(0.00034s)2
a = -5017.3 m/s2

(you can double-check my math, but I don't believe that's the issue).

So, my specific question: this approach clearly doesn't yield the correct answer - there's something wrong with my thinking here. What specifically is wrong with it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math was wrong.
thehitchcocks said:
The problem:
A bullet is moving at a speed of 367 m/s when it embeds into a lump of moist clay. The bullet penetrates for a distance of 0.0621m. Determine the acceleration of the bullet while moving into the clay.


I can get the correct answer by using Vf2 = Vi2 + 2ad (result: -1.08*10-6 m/s2).

However, I'm trying to understand why an approach using the average velocity doesn't work (that's what I tried first). Can you help me understand what's wrong with the following approach? :

Vavg = (Vi + Vf)/2 = 183.5 m/s

t = d/v
t = 0.0621m / (183.5 m/s) = 0.00034s

d = Vit + 1/2at2
0.0621m = 183.5 m/s * 0.00034s + 1/2a(0.00034s)2

a = -5017.3 m/s2

(you can double-check my math, but I don't believe that's the issue).

So, my specific question: this approach clearly doesn't yield the correct answer - there's something wrong with my thinking here. What specifically is wrong with it?

You use Vavg where you should use Vi.
Also, you have a negative exponent on what you call the correct answer.
 
You plugged in average velocity instead of initial velocity.

If you don't mind my saying, I don't see any maths in your post: just lots of numbers. Part of the reason you made this mistake is that one number looks very like another and as soon as you plug in the numbers, you lose sight of the maths and physics.
 
thehitchcocks said:
0.0621m = 183.5 m/s * 0.00034s + 1/2a(0.00034s)2
Hi thehitchcocks:

The term 183.5 m/s is not Vi. It is 1/2 Vi.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Thanks for all the replies! Super helpful. We understand now - we got ourselves wrapped up mistakenly in average velocity, when all we needed was initial velocity. Using initial velocity yields the correct answer.

@RUber: Yes, the negative exponent was a typo - sorry about that, our first post ever here, and I didn't catch the error amidst all the markup :( Thanks also for coming back and updating your original response, re: the relationship between our answer and the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K