Why Does a Balloon Fall Up in an Elevator?

AI Thread Summary
In an accelerating downward elevator, a balloon's behavior can be perplexing due to the effects of buoyancy and gravity. When the elevator accelerates downwards at acceleration g, the balloon experiences no buoyancy force because the effective acceleration inside the elevator is zero. Observers outside see the balloon in free fall, leading to confusion about its expected upward movement. The discussion highlights that if the elevator is sealed, the air inside also accelerates, creating a pressure gradient that affects buoyancy. Ultimately, the balloon does not rise because the absence of a pressure gradient negates the buoyancy force in this scenario.
hachikuda
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Imagine you are in an elevator accelerating downwards with acceleration g, holding a balloon (which would fly upwards if left outside). Now if the thread you are holding snaps, what will happen to the balloon?
Since the acceleration felt inside the elevator is 0, the balloon should not experience any buoyancy and continue to stay at the same position.

The difficulty I am having in understanding is, if this experiment is observed from outside (i.e. from an inertial frame of reference), the balloon seems to be in a free fall towards the ground, where as it should actually be rising up.

Where is the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the air in the elevator? Should we suppose it moves together with the elevator?

If yes, then as soon as the thread snaps, the force of drag will be acting on the balloon, which makes the whole thing quite difficult.

If no, then the dynamics of the balloon will not be affected by the motion of the elevator after the thread snaps.
 
hachikuda said:
The difficulty I am having in understanding is, if this experiment is observed from outside (i.e. from an inertial frame of reference), the balloon seems to be in a free fall towards the ground, where as it should actually be rising up.
Why should it be rising up in the inertial frame? The force of buoyancy is frame independent, and there is none, because there is no air pressure gradient in the elevator. Since gravity is the only force acting on the balloon in the inertial frame, it accelerates down.
 
A.T. said:
The force of buoyancy is frame independent, and there is none, because there is no air pressure gradient in the elevator.

That is not true if the elevator is (approximately) a sealed box. In that case, the air inside the elevator is also accelerating, and the force causing the acceleration is a pressure gradient between the floor and the roof of the elevator.

Even when the acceleration is zero, the buoyancy force is just another name for the resultant force on the object caused by the pressure in the fluid. With no acceleration, there is still a pressure gradient, caused by the weight of the fluid. That statement is rather more "obvious" if you think about why pressure in water increase with depth, but the same is true of air.
 
There is no pressure gradient. The elevator is in free fall.
 
AlephZero said:
the air inside the elevator is also accelerating, and the force causing the acceleration is a pressure gradient between the floor and the roof of the elevator.
No, the force causing the acceleration is gravity.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top