Buoyancy of ship, volume displaced, and tension of crane (in/out) of water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of water displaced by an 18,000 kg steel hull when submerged and the tension in the crane's cable during this process. The volume of water displaced can be determined using the hull's mass and the density of steel. When the hull is fully submerged, the tension in the crane's cable is influenced by both the weight of the hull and the buoyant force acting on it. The tension is calculated differently when the hull is out of the water, simply equating to the weight of the hull. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding buoyancy and volume displacement in these calculations.
orbits
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A crane lifts the 18,000kg steel hull of a ship out of the water.
The density of steel is known to be 7.8 x 103 kg/m3, while that of water is 1000 kg/m3.


A) While the steel hull is fully submerged in the water, what is the volume of water displaced by the hull? I really have no idea how to work this problem out.


Buoyancy = m* density * V displaced * G
m=pv





B) What is the tension in the crane's cable when the hull is fully submerged?
I believe this one is related to A

Density * Volume * G = F m=(density) Volume
1000* 18000/10 *10

f=1.8 x 107


C) What is the tension in the crane's cable when the hull is out of the water?

Ft= mg
Ft = 18,000 * 10 (class standard)
Ft= 180,000N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have the mass of the material and its density, can't you find its volume? That volume displace the same volume of water.
 
Bright Wang said:
If you have the mass of the material and its density, can't you find its volume? That volume displace the same volume of water.

Only if the hull fills with water. If it does not, it displaces far more water than its own volume.

The question seems a bit tricky. It talks about a fully-submerged the hull, which, to me, strongly suggests that the hull has filled with water (unless it's a watertight submarine hull I suppose :-p).

So, I guess you're right. They're simply talking about the volume of the steel itself, not any kind of bouyant hull-shape.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top