Buoyant force acting on an inverted glass in water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of an inverted glass submerged in water and the forces acting on it, particularly the buoyant force and the force required to maintain constant velocity. Participants clarify that as the glass descends, the air inside compresses, leading to a continuous decrease in gas volume and buoyancy. Key principles discussed include Newton's Second Law and Archimedes' principle, emphasizing that the net force must remain zero for constant velocity motion. Misunderstandings regarding the behavior of gas volume and buoyancy at varying depths are addressed, highlighting the complexities of fluid dynamics in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law
  • Familiarity with Archimedes' principle
  • Basic knowledge of gas laws, particularly isothermal compression
  • Concept of buoyancy and its relation to fluid density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Archimedes' principle in varying fluid densities
  • Explore the behavior of ideal gases under pressure and temperature changes
  • Learn about the dynamics of objects moving through fluids at different velocities
  • Investigate the effects of depth on buoyancy and gas compression in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those interested in fluid dynamics, buoyancy, and gas laws. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand the forces acting on submerged objects and the principles governing their motion.

  • #61
erobz said:
Good... plug that in, solve for ##\delta(h)##. I would suggest evaluating that solution at ##h = 0## to ensure you have chosen the correct form.
Ok I will but why should I find this ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
MatinSAR said:
Ok I will but why should I find this ?
Because you to eliminate ##\delta## as an independent variable and get everything in terms of the depth ##h##.
 
  • #63
erobz said:
Because you to eliminate ##\delta## as an independent variable and get everything in terms of the depth ##h##.
If we consider h=0 :
1670960911717.png
 
  • #64
MatinSAR said:
If we consider h=0 :
View attachment 318757
Thats isn't what I meant.

Did you solve for ##\delta## as a function of ##h## yet?

Remember, ##\delta## is part of both the pressure and the volume of the gas. When I say solve for ##\delta## I mean solve the following for ##\delta##:

$$P_{atm} A l = P(h,\delta) V\llap{-}(\delta)$$
 
Last edited:
  • #65
MatinSAR said:
If we consider h=0 :
View attachment 318757
Think about what h=0 physically corresponds to.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz and MatinSAR
  • #66
erobz said:
Thats isn't what I meant.

Did you solve for ##\delta## as a function of ##h## yet?

Remember, ##\delta## is part of both the pressure and the volume of the gas. When I say solve for ##\delta## I mean solve the following for ##\delta##:

$$P_{atm} A l = P(h,\delta) V\llap{-}(\delta)$$
Can I find δ using :

PatmL/(L -δ) = Patm+ρg(h-δ)
Frabjous said:
Think about what h=0 physically corresponds to.
The moment that the glass enters the water.
 
  • #67
MatinSAR said:
Can I find δ using :

PatmL/(L -δ) = Patm+ρg(h-δ)
Give it a try.
 
  • #68
erobz said:
Give it a try.
1670966257808.png

At h=0 delta should be zero. The above equation confirms this.
And we can see that if h goes to ∞ the delta goes to L.
 
Last edited:
  • #69
MatinSAR said:
View attachment 318764
At h=0 delta should be zero. The above equation confirms this.
And we can see that if h goes to ∞ the delta goes to L.
Seems good. I had to check whether that quadratic simplified, I didn't take it that far! Good Job!
 
  • #70
erobz said:
Seems good. I had to check whether that quadratic simplified, I didn't take it that far! Good Job!
I appreciate your help. I didn't use PatmL/(L -δ) = Patm+ρg(h-δ) because
2nd degree equation was obtained ...

I have used the formula you suggested ...
 
  • #71
MatinSAR said:
I appreciate your help. I didn't use PatmL/(L -δ) = Patm+ρg(h-δ) because
2nd degree equation was obtained ...

I have used the formula you suggested ...
What formula?
 
  • #74
erobz said:
I don't understand! I solved it as a quadratic. However, your result indicates that my quadratic must be factorable I believe?
Maybe I made a mistake ...
was my answer correct ??
 
  • #75
MatinSAR said:
Maybe I made a mistake ...
was my answer correct ??
It plots identically to my solution?
 
  • #76
erobz said:
It plots identically to my solution?
Let me send you a picture of what I have done ...
 
  • #77
erobz said:
It plots identically to my solution?
My mistake is here :
1670968816408.png


So to find delta we have to solve a quadratic equation ...

The question only asked about the increase and decrease of F force, I didn't want to waste your time at all... I'm sorry...
edit :

2022_12_14 1_55 AM Office Lens.jpg


I have solved that quadratic equation ...
 
Last edited:
  • #78
MatinSAR said:
My mistake is here :
View attachment 318768

So to find delta we have to solve a quadratic equation ...

The question only asked about the increase and decrease of F force, I didn't want to waste your time at all... I'm sorry...
edit :

View attachment 318770

I have solved that quadratic equation ...
What you did on accident the first time by omitting ##\delta## was actually a really good approximation for ##\delta \ll h##. For the parameters I used I couldn’t tell the apart.
 
  • #79
MatinSAR said:
My mistake is here :
View attachment 318768

So to find delta we have to solve a quadratic equation ...

The question only asked about the increase and decrease of F force, I didn't want to waste your time at all... I'm sorry...
edit :

View attachment 318770

I have solved that quadratic equation ...
I wanted you to explore it. It wasn’t a waste of my time at all!
 
  • #80
erobz said:
I wanted you to explore it. It wasn’t a waste of my time at all!
Thank you for your help and time ... 🙏🙏
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K