Buoyant force on a balloon is equal to the mass of air it displaces

AI Thread Summary
The buoyant force on a balloon is determined by the mass of the air it displaces, which must equal the total weight of the balloon and its contents for it to ascend. To find the required diameter of a spherical hydrogen-filled balloon that weighs 175 kg, one must first calculate the volume needed for sufficient buoyancy using the ideal gas law (PV=nRT). The mass of hydrogen gas and its moles can be derived from the given conditions of temperature and pressure. The volume can then be converted to radius and diameter using the formula for the volume of a sphere. Understanding buoyancy calculations is essential for solving this problem effectively.
chemguy12345
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The buoyant force on a balloon is equal to the mass of air it displaces. The gravitational force on the balloon is equal to the sum of the masses of the balloon, the gas it contains, and the balloonist. If the balloon and balloonist together weight 175 kg, what would the diameter of a spherical hydrogen-filled balloon have to be in meters if the rig is to get off the ground at 22 degrees Celsius and 752 mmHg? (Take MM air= 29.0 g/mol)

Homework Equations



We're currently studying gases. So I'm thinking of finding mass of h2 gas and then the moles of H2, then the volume and plugging into V=(4/3)(Pi)(r^3) to find radius and then diameter. Relevant Equations --> V=nRT/P. (r=.0821 atm L/mol K), PV=nRT(ideal gas law)

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know where to begin. The wording is confusing me. Help please
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You need to calculate first what volume will have buoyancy high enough.
 


What formula would I have to use? I'm not sure because we haven't learned anything about buoyancy yet. Thank you for helping
 


Buoyancy is physics, but you are told how to calculate it - it equals mass (I would say weight) of the air balloon displaces.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top