But how accurate is my regression function?

AI Thread Summary
The user created a regression function to calculate an "average" line but is seeking assistance to identify any errors in their implementation. They provided a link to an image illustrating their work, despite the language barrier, indicating that those familiar with regression should understand the variables. The user has made progress but is looking for further help to ensure accuracy. The discussion revolves around troubleshooting and improving the regression function. Overall, the user successfully made the function work but still seeks validation and guidance.
or.han
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey.
I tried to make a function that could calculate the function of a "average" line. See my picture:
http://home1.stofanet.dk/orhan/regr.jpg
The language is danish but if you know about regression you will understand the variables. What have I done wrong?

or.han
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anyone who can help?
 
I made it work...
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top