C is only a component of light speed?

AI Thread Summary
Light travels at speed "c" as an electromagnetic wave, which oscillates in electric and magnetic fields, not in the motion of photons themselves. The oscillation represents the electric field's amplitude rather than the physical movement of photons. Misunderstandings often arise from high school physics materials that inadequately explain these concepts. The distinction between wave properties and photon behavior is crucial for understanding light's nature. Clarifying these points enhances comprehension of electromagnetic wave dynamics.
Quadratic
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm just thinking that since light is an electromagnetic wave, it must move sinusoidally. So, wouldn't it just be going forward at the speed of "c", while the wave itself would be going up and down as well? And if that's the case, wouldn't the actual speed of the photons be much faster if the wave was more stretched out? I'll try to draw what I mean:
Code:
          c -->
  ___              ___
 /    \           /     \    
/      \         /       \    
        \       /         \    
         \___/           \
I may be completely wrong on this, but if so, why?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Quadratic said:
I'm just thinking that since light is an electromagnetic wave, it must move sinusoidally. So, wouldn't it just be going forward at the speed of "c", while the wave itself would be going up and down as well? And if that's the case, wouldn't the actual speed of the photons be much faster if the wave was more stretched out? I'll try to draw what I mean:
Code:
c -->
___              ___
/    \           /     \    
/      \         /       \    
\       /         \    
\___/           \
I may be completely wrong on this, but if so, why?

You probably do not realize that what is "oscillating" is not photons, but rather the electric field that is being carried by each of these photons. The photons themselves do not wiggle up and down in space.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
You probably do not realize that what is "oscillating" is not photons, but rather the electric field that is being carried by each of these photons. The photons themselves do not wiggle up and down in space.

Zz.
Ahh. Well then... I guess I learned something. Thanks.
 
It took me until I entered College physics for the first time to actually figure that out. High School physics books are really bad at showing you that, they show you this little picture of light traveling sinusoidally, never actually tell you that the y dimension in that graph is not a distance, but the intensity of the electric (or magnetic) field as the photon travels in the x direction.

~Lyuokdea
 
I think you mean amplitude, not intensity.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top