C/C++ [C++] Learning a programming language

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the best approach to learning C++ after grasping the basics, including I/O, conditionals, and pointers. One option is to study a comprehensive textbook like Bjarne Stroustrup's, which is highly regarded as a reference for C++. However, there's a suggestion to also engage in practical problem-solving through platforms like Project Euler, which can enhance coding skills through real-world applications. While Stroustrup's book is valuable, it may not be ideal as a primary textbook for everyone. An alternative recommendation is a book by Koenig and Moo, which focuses on using the C++ standard library and encourages a progressive learning style. It's noted that Project Euler can be quite challenging, often requiring more mathematical knowledge than programming skills, which may discourage some learners. Overall, a combination of structured learning and practical coding exercises is suggested for effective mastery of C++.
trollcast
Gold Member
Messages
282
Reaction score
13
I'm trying to learn C++ at the minute and I've managed to get over the basics, I/O, Conditionals, Repetition up to and a bit of pointers.

Now what I'm wondering is should I get a textbook that is solely on C++, eg. Barjne Soustroups one, and learn specifically C++.

Or learn by doing problems on places like Project Euler and prehaps maybe a book on another topic that's written in C++, specifically something like this: https://www.amazon.com/dp/032144146X/?tag=pfamazon01-20 , and learn from the code examples and practice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Technology news on Phys.org
The best way to learn how to write code is to write code. Pick some problems that you are interested in and try to write code to implement these problems.
 
trollcast said:
eg. Barjne Soustroups one

You mean this one?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0321543726/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I haven't seen it myself, but it's gotten good reviews on Amazon, and I think anything Stroustrup writes about C++ is worth reading. I see a new edition of his "bible" is coming out in May:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0321563840/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I wouldn't use it as a textbook, although some people claim to have done that. I think of it as the ultimate reference. Over the years, previous editions have been my "go-to" book when I want to refresh my memory about some C++ feature.

Depending on your learning style, you might also consider https://www.amazon.com/dp/020170353X/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Koenig and Moo. Its strong point is in learning how to use the standard "containers" in the C++ standard library, or what many books still call the "STL" (Standard Template Library): vectors, lists, etc. instead of plain old arrays. It's all based on one or two examples which are developed progressively in succeeding chapters, instead of using free-standing examples in each chapter. So it's best read through (and worked through) from beginning to end, which isn't good if you like to jump around depending on which topic catches your fancy at the moment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
trollcast said:
I'm trying to learn C++ at the minute and I've managed to get over the basics, I/O, Conditionals, Repetition up to and a bit of pointers.

Now what I'm wondering is should I get a textbook that is solely on C++, eg. Barjne Soustroups one, and learn specifically C++.

Or learn by doing problems on places like Project Euler and prehaps maybe a book on another topic that's written in C++, specifically something like this: https://www.amazon.com/dp/032144146X/?tag=pfamazon01-20 , and learn from the code examples and practice?

Trying to learn C++ by doing Project Euler is going to discourage you quite a bit. It's not an easy task. Project Euler is very difficult (at least it was for me). It requires better knowledge in math than it does programming, and I'm the other way around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
Thread 'Project Documentation'
Trying to package up a small bank account manager project that I have been tempering on for a while. One that is certainly worth something to me. Although I have created methods to whip up quick documents with all fields and properties. I would like something better to reference in order to express the mechanical functions. It is unclear to me about any standardized format for code documentation that exists. I have tried object orientated diagrams with shapes to try and express the...
Back
Top