C13 NMR Interpretation Homework - C,H,O 116g/mol

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around interpreting a C13 NMR spectrum for a compound with a molecular weight of 116 g/mol, consisting of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Key peaks indicate the presence of CH3, CH2, and a carboxyl group, suggesting the compound is likely an ester rather than a carboxylic acid. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the molecular formula is C6H12O2, with the structure being a straight-chain ester. The final identification of the compound is narrowed down to either methyl pentanoate or butyl acetate, with methyl pentanoate being the more likely candidate based on peak shifts. Accurate interpretation of the spectrum is crucial for determining the correct molecular identity.
gbpackfan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having a bit of difficulty interpreting the spectrum. I've given it a shot but I think I might be missing something. The compound contains only C,H,O and any assistance would be appreciated. The molecular weight is 116g/mol.

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



Peak at 13.73= CH3
Peak at 22.32= CH2R2
Peaks at 27.09 and 33.85= CH3
Peak at 51= C-O
Peaks in the grouping at 77= C-C double bonding?
Peak at 174 is a possible carboxylic acid?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
gbpackfan said:
Peaks in the grouping at 77= C-C double bonding?
Remember to check for solvent peaks. In this case, the 1:1:1 triplet at 77 ppm is CDCl3. Also, the OP has (tacitly) correctly assumed that the peak at 0 ppm is TMS.

Other than those, we have 6 peaks, meaning 6 inequivalent carbons. Now we get to work interpreting the rest of the spectrum.

gbpackfan said:
Peak at 174 is a possible carboxylic acid?
A carboxyl group: either an acid or an ester. This means we have at least 2 oxygens. If we add up the molar masses of 6 carbons and 2 oxygens, we get 12*6 + 16*2 = 104 g/mol; in other words 12 g/mol shy of the given molar mass. It's pretty inconceivable that these 12 g/mol will be another carbon atom, so since the compound only has C, H, and O, the molecular formula for the compound is C6H12O2.

gbpackfan said:
Peak at 51= C-O
A single bond C-O indicates that the compound is an ester instead of a carboxylic acid.

gbpackfan said:
Peak at 13.73= CH3
Only 1 alkyl CH3 group indicates that there's probably no branching; in other words, all the alkyl chains in the molecules are straight.

The above considerations severely limit the identity of the molecule. It's a straight chain ester with a formula of C6H12O2. The next part is a little tricky. The NMR spectrum gives only one CH3 unfunctionalized alkyl resonance. What does that say about either side of the ester? Well, alpha carbons on the carboxyl side of the ester are generally shifted downfield from plain alkyl groups (in fact, this carbon corresponds to the peak at 33.85 ppm), and we've already identified the peak corresponding to the carbon attached to the alcohol side of the ester (51 ppm). Since there is only one CH3 unfunctionalized alkyl peak, that means that either we have a methyl group on the alcohol side or an acetate group on the carboxyl side. This constrains us to one of two molecules: either methyl pentanoate, or butyl acetate.

Personally, if I were giving this as a homework problem, I'd accept either one of these molecules as an answer (it's extremely tough to tell the difference between them without some other information). However, in the interest of completeness, you have to compare typical shifts of a CH3COO carbon vs. a RCH2COO carbon. Doing this will tell you (roughly) that the peak at 33.85 ppm is a RCH2COO carbon, instead of an acetate. This would correctly identify the molecule as methyl pentanoate. Again, though, the spectra of the two molecules are similar enough that I'm not sure I'd worry if I didn't get it exactly right.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top